Subject: Re: stdin pipe rename in 3.2.0
From: Brian Inglis <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 05:30:32 -0600
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>

On 2021-03-19 01:53, Christoph Reiter via Cygwin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 4:47 AM Brian Inglis wrote:
>> On 2021-03-18 14:28, Christoph Reiter via Cygwin wrote:
>> If these are being renamed should they not now use neutral terminology based on
>> terms such as primary and secondary, and the primary/default repo branches on a
>> term such as main?

> Yes. Though there are ~700 instances of such terms in the cygwin code
> so I'd suggest you propose this separately to the list.

I'm not suggesting anyone even attempt to do a mass clean up of such terms.

But as any area needs work where these terms are used, take the opportunity.

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.
[Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.]
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple