X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6EBAE3AA9927
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1614873285;
	bh=rWirJ9pDfPWmyWbvTWaN6Ri5PCcogfWfJDlNW03JvkI=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	 From;
	b=k1iQXmBQNA0hTWNSmce578N5RateC0zym7AII1AoyApX7ltiBrST71a0ArDhd0/Rb
	 LyGrATVpzBgbaRIEy24nGaRMKTw84ubqVpkMRBrrbHmVKW0a749qIp8hoOwRVFt7cT
	 2C6Yqw7vpvfDfR/qaEqcJXkE3NZdBD/ulwtQ+8aI=
X-Original-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 77FC33AA9916
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:54:39 +0100
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: segfault on 32bit cygwin snapshot
Message-ID: <YEECv6bGundDfBbI@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <20210301095546.dce31a474bd0cec2c3518f87@nifty.ne.jp>
 <20210301212542.8b1749f92af62c01b008f25a@nifty.ne.jp>
 <20210302200308.62db4fe01f78fb35a538784f@nifty.ne.jp>
 <YD5eXbxBWbUUSwcM@calimero.vinschen.de>
 <20210303185621.b048287526901af6a4c8200a@nifty.ne.jp>
 <YD9sSea32T7GqlJr@calimero.vinschen.de>
 <20210304180534.7c3825e6ee989a2bf62f0652@nifty.ne.jp>
 <CAB8Xom-HwxH9LnbLL8cAoXh60tjU592T6XFEDJzvhv28Do-UsQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210304205000.4ac34afe1a8b767ea2986291@nifty.ne.jp>
 <b7338aaa-c1e1-1816-35f8-666c2f6ac618@cornell.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b7338aaa-c1e1-1816-35f8-666c2f6ac618@cornell.edu>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:bc2cttBni7RpU2GX+Z/g2Ias/0cPqSfQ4uE5qzUTgpdeZhzfaSK
 WmU2IQMqHaCIzMa+0PJDvkTugG2aRlc20n75aIRuZ7U518WlFnu58Kqg+rH09mzdV2yQMV4
 0Fu/CiF6jR+CIy0Pirkb3gul4czsu+PKAL8fO6Vo7eW5nfzfjf0wiBOsgE5szn3+XKnK5tV
 Ew9yxkcFHOdybSAETnKYw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:3glcM2Y8u2E=:3Uzi3W9SA9NbVWr9KDer3C
 Q9OVX6kNpdu2KyhOB74L2K8Dwoq9z6RGPtAsaZvjc11rkDmsjL57ibwWlfI94m2UTuw1lHLBT
 IO02rhbd1p+Vm6v0tY6+roKB6lih4gDT8MdwzgJu7iKzWWqt3w9k48tc3ZGOI0N/w6F8EFb4o
 2QxCT7cfM/I1QNuKXfEmae7X5y6cZQrpnrtK4FivYF8DsSNFsX97VO5KvlN2OEp09QJFZDgsK
 ZMtMp29upTUdnob5XslNJl7l/RHcnJNluG+t+WXvP/MU2d3s2tF/aum3mlp+aO+keiDwiQ7Wj
 HS9ehg0GQquQq7sYEl8NH+OTL4a9PRpWw9z9YVLJNvbcPimyT/FzfMSVncW8lw7HcHOey27we
 FroytbmYzzeyMew2mjrIQcmgVrlmpLSZFaWd/Ncq6MVd8tFXY5NIiaYMg8QVMFcFApOAK1fB1
 Ea1aETUzZg==
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
 GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN, KAM_DMARC_NONE, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NEUTRAL,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=subscribe>
From: Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Cc: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces@cygwin.com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces@cygwin.com>

On Mar  4 10:17, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> On 3/4/2021 6:50 AM, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:11:11 +0100
> > marco atzeri wrote:
> > > I have no problem to patch Python to solve the issue,
> > > but I have not seen evidence of the dlsym mechanism .
> > > But of course I an NOT and expert in this field.
> > > 
> > > If someone looking to the code can give me some hints,
> > > I will appreciate
> > 
> > I am also not sure where the dlsym() is used in python.
> > At least, os.uname() works in python 3.8.7 and 2.7.18 in my
> > environment even without that snippet. It seems that os.uname()
> > does not use dlsym(). Do I overlook something?
> 
> This all started because Mark reported a problem building python 3.8.3:
> 
>   https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-apps/2020-December/040765.html
>   https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-developers/2020-December/012019.html
> 
> It's strange that Marco never bumped into the problem.

Right.  I was wondering the same when I read Marco's reply.  I thought
this is something in old python versions, but my testing never involved
python.  I just used a simple uname implementation calling uname via
dlopen/dlsym.

Either way, the problem persists.  Newly built executables requesting
uname via dlsym should certainly get the new implementation.


Corinna
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
