DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 3E3DF3842438
Subject: Re: Problem with OpenMPI
To: "cygwin@cygwin.com" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
References: <CAL8czr2kheRUF+PPt6RinGdoYROc82hXEUGzcA7Lsa_gt680iA@mail.gmail.com>
 <fca6059d-ea72-a758-3ed2-8dcecee5d414@gmail.com>
 <CAG0O4Lv+Hz8BnkWr+Wuo8bLAWihDwMJpvigNFtDsErthKdN3NA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3fd80f9f-107d-42bf-ff22-906f4a32f65a@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 17:12:39 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAG0O4Lv+Hz8BnkWr+Wuo8bLAWihDwMJpvigNFtDsErthKdN3NA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: it
Precedence: list
From: Marco Atzeri via Cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Reply-To: Marco Atzeri <marco.atzeri@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces@cygwin.com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces@cygwin.com>

back on the mailing list

On 03.10.2020 16:55, Massimiliano Alvioli wrote:
>>> Has anyone found this before? Shouldn't the flag -J/usr/lib be issued as
>>> part of the string issued by mpifort?
> 
> I found this a few times - not using mpifort but mpif90 - and I
> believe it may be due to
> a mismatch between the version of gcc and the compiler used to build mpi
> 
> 
> M
> 

interesting, but I do not see the problem and

$ gfortran  --version
GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.2.0

but when I built the openmpi-3.1.6 was last may with version 9

--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple