X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Original-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: cygwin@cygwin.com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 0EB303858D37 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=SystematicSw.ab.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=brian.inglis@systematicsw.ab.ca X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=fZA2N3YF c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=kiZT5GMN3KAWqtYcXc+/4Q==:117 a=kiZT5GMN3KAWqtYcXc+/4Q==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=gwMg6M9y6T5EFgRA8E4A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Subject: Re: [cygwin] Issue on output when using javac or scalac under emacs To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <254353029.2017595.1598395227754.JavaMail.open-xchange@opme11oxm24aub.bagnolet.francetelecom.fr> <069901d67b36$35b4f370$a11eda50$@pdinc.us> From: Brian Inglis Autocrypt: addr=Brian.Inglis@SystematicSw.ab.ca; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEXopx8xYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAnCK0qv/xwUCCZQoA9BHRYpstERrspfT0NkUWQVuoePa0 LkJyaWFuIEluZ2xpcyA8QnJpYW4uSW5nbGlzQFN5c3RlbWF0aWNTdy5hYi5jYT6IlgQTFggA PhYhBMM5/lbU970GBS2bZB62lxu92I8YBQJeinHzAhsDBQkJZgGABQsJCAcCBhUKCQgLAgQW AgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEB62lxu92I8Y0ioBAI8xrggNxziAVmr+Xm6nnyjoujMqWcq3oEhlYGAO WacZAQDFtdDx2koSVSoOmfaOyRTbIWSf9/Cjai29060fsmdsDLg4BF6KcfMSCisGAQQBl1UB BQEBB0Awv8kHI2PaEgViDqzbnoe8B9KMHoBZLS92HdC7ZPh8HQMBCAeIfgQYFggAJhYhBMM5 /lbU970GBS2bZB62lxu92I8YBQJeinHzAhsMBQkJZgGAAAoJEB62lxu92I8YZwUBAJw/74rF IyaSsGI7ewCdCy88Lce/kdwX7zGwid+f8NZ3AQC/ezTFFi5obXnyMxZJN464nPXiggtT9gN5 RSyTY8X+AQ== Organization: Systematic Software Message-ID: Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 20:38:15 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <069901d67b36$35b4f370$a11eda50$@pdinc.us> Content-Language: en-CA X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfAJ+CmuX+1TAIzjSKthFK93BxcWc06IhAPCTq6lZslo9Uwrz1nB2kDGVMzIIiMxkmJLS274z28v8soZYIHo2qU1TLqq3s/oW6/SYTIPQD2H+zTwq1nIb +KuolW2g5fQVRDWffEh+Xszicr/arKiaD3RHr/s70Lxsa+MoyV/uAdmSyHsd4eoXqpWi2mn+nc75VcAzz/LH5Gy5CU84mrzsWb5YptWrzVLPHoc5ti6P/3sl X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Cc: Luc Henninger Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces@cygwin.com Sender: "Cygwin" On 2020-08-25 17:19, Jason Pyeron wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Luc Henninger >> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 6:40 PM >> > > I'm thick - what the issue? There was no body to the email. There were three attachments with javac complaining about a missing symbol, but it is unclear under what conditions which product produced each of the outputs, what output was expected, and what was the issue with what was actually output? -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. [Data in IEC units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.] -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple