DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 4F53538708F8
Message-ID: <808225108db9bd9b485a4a177ee0e146b45a93d9.camel@tdcadsl.dk>
Subject: Re: Synchronization problem with posix_spawn
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 09:58:04 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20200820125011.GR3272@calimero.vinschen.de>
References: <b1992e8b-d2e8-9c44-8f93-a270d5a879ed@cornell.edu>
 <864b3031-9fc8-beb3-ba7c-1ade4c31a288@cornell.edu>
 <20200730115913.GL4206@calimero.vinschen.de>
 <20200730171723.GA460314@calimero.vinschen.de>
 <86051625-646d-065a-8543-1c3086411d3d@cornell.edu>
 <20200731081025.GB460314@calimero.vinschen.de>
 <9c44f4351d459a2ba8d27c65bf71679208cb13d6.camel@tdcadsl.dk>
 <20200803105004.GK460314@calimero.vinschen.de>
 <1ae8de15bb74efb7207299d2dba92cdef88d9a94.camel@tdcadsl.dk>
 <20200820125011.GR3272@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.4 (3.36.4-1.fc32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: list
From: Peter Dons Tychsen via Cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Reply-To: Peter Dons Tychsen <donpedro@tdcadsl.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces@cygwin.com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces@cygwin.com>

Hi Corinna,

On Thu, 2020-08-20 at 14:50 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> No, it won't work as expected, as you can see from the discussion in
> 
> this thread.  Some internal work would be required.

OK. So even with no file actions and spawn atributes, it still would
break things.

What kind of things would not work? Could you share a few thoughts on
what would be needed? Just to get an idea of the workload it would
imply.

Thanks,

/pedro
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple