X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8E0663938C3E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1592803215;
	bh=z50zhBFkQLtXRQzOm12XChORKJlY0+EengIwXPP+c1E=;
	h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	 From;
	b=Tz2ILxm9LTl+EITVgVD/LAkTqMckhreBhAc7HA4Eb3J3v9JsA7+Z0RuGY2IJuTBs4
	 SOF9s8Qf2FBHe1QrwCx4KU9VXIBXRy1y2jc8FuiK5gk24GRfB2zJN8dexzWhg6xAVe
	 K4ELOH7H+RLKI/ns4h5hWc2StUjQ1IxKzKDsQ1OQ=
X-Original-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 7671C3840C3D
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
 :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=x160qNzYja60zhyIwimkN/NO/r7s9ejSBYAcAOnAg+A=;
 b=KMqCBujZzmbYDE8yYvlhr2g1Oh4vHoYWfMlhhgBP2NrEl3IPnxh8UJ38PRdBIixlBF
 W+t1PfZJUuk7egcWVdBMrUmg/nCQrj/OuoQhMt0YsYAoxRhTTDNBzBUYfi1LM+Q8WPlo
 D9wpUs29hLBCIgvdEjDDjQVAuPgRVV6n7g0C+GyRQaffnWNljPTBdcSn8t02Saj3N8z7
 5CVYTFM2xdO6pZ07+yVC9aQYCrSCkWrQiEgp+Fia5IQ06UcEm2KvxtMpqfVxSqdEL0eb
 iewFBDHhOfos5ytNzXWwl7AO1lXPE789PUFOu6TSJ+pgslYwKeRSxSXD2avXI7lwMv6h
 j/Aw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531gRQ7br/6QBNuHABSk31GSSJi7X5hr9xcJ2NIHGeD5rTssp0dY
 E8rzAIIB0hyOUTOjndkUmyxgURn7
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx59xP6lYvOw2Fjh9atis6MiJ2uZcwKIIHuAe5un+3BtOcyCVOuKP+BO0xVhJFd3pIoPm3q6g==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1153:: with SMTP id
 g19mr14828322edw.127.1592803212323; 
 Sun, 21 Jun 2020 22:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Apparent bug in either (1) Cygwin default Package-list or (2)
 Package "bzr" dependency-list
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <CAGUd5DUvzsGYvfj-5eT5D=_WWxQ2_gvemMOLND2_1Ht1M9jtoA@mail.gmail.com>
 <45a8baf1-f636-7c03-ec1f-7c72ee73c56d@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
 <f4e59e7b-3a69-1f56-5276-f7036a5065c6@dronecode.org.uk>
 <d25f12af-f495-fa79-c29f-aa8f0cb179d7@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
 <CAGUd5DWJ-NEZ-9Z-2tzsAptNKnwxJcJ5wTtHk2a2h-45yZTOxA@mail.gmail.com>
 <MN2PR17MB39991ED3424DF98A4703CBBFB8970@MN2PR17MB3999.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <b9b65cfe-282d-47ba-3133-9b58717c73cc@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:20:10 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR17MB39991ED3424DF98A4703CBBFB8970@MN2PR17MB3999.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Language: it
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM,
 RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=subscribe>
From: Marco Atzeri via Cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Reply-To: Marco Atzeri <marco.atzeri@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces@cygwin.com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces@cygwin.com>

On 22.06.2020 04:21, Allen Hewes via Cygwin wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Cygwin <cygwin-bounces@cygwin.com> On Behalf Of My Name via
>> Cygwin
>> Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2020 2:04 PM
>> To: Brian.Inglis@systematicsw.ab.ca
>> Cc: The Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin@cygwin.com>
>> Subject: Re: Apparent bug in either (1) Cygwin default Package-list or (2)
>> Package "bzr" dependency-list
>>
>> This is mostly over my head, so I'm sorry if my comment here is irrelevant,
>> but I'll point out in case anyone here doesn't know, Python 3 doesn't make
>> Python 2 obsolete. They are somewhat incompatible. Python 2 source
>> doesn't always run in Python 3 without extensive modification. If there's any
>> message you all would like me to deliver to the Bazaar (bzr) forum, I will; but
>> I'm not a Bazaar developer either, just a user.
>>
> 
> Yep, I am in agreement here. I don't understand why Python 2 gets attention from Cygwin maintainers. I have a found a few packages that are "linked" (e.g. they have dependencies on either the Python27 or Python2/Python meta-package), which would explain this to some degree. Usually, it's just a rebuild (e.g. a re-configure) of the depending-ee...
> 
> I can't get rid of three Python 2.7 packages: python27, python27-pip, python27-setuptools. I switched over to using alternatives (sometime ago) so that I can "stop" the craziness of the meta-package "python". I don't want Python 2 as my 'python'.
> 
> The need to have two Pythons installed at the same time seems to be over. Shouldn't this remove the need to have meta-packages?
> 
> Cygiwn isn't alone is keeping Python 2 alive.
> 
> /allen
> 

by default "python" is "python2" so anything calling python still 
requires python2, see:

https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0394/

and there are a lot of packages in cygwin doing it.

Packaging requires time and currently on python we are short of it.

I am moving to package all python-subpackages for 3.8 and
after we can look to move some packages from python2 (2.7)
to python 3 (target 3.8)

Regards
MArco


--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
