DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 58312393F40C
Subject: Re: coreutils refresh request (again)
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <DM6PR09MB4043A2D88F847670BC44F4CBA5830@DM6PR09MB4043.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <73a89e83-3496-b2fe-162b-2ff7c038c0dc@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:46:55 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR09MB4043A2D88F847670BC44F4CBA5830@DM6PR09MB4043.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Language: it
Precedence: list
From: Marco Atzeri via Cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Reply-To: Marco Atzeri <marco.atzeri@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces@cygwin.com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces@cygwin.com>

On 10.06.2020 18:21, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via Cygwin wrote:
>> https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2020-June/245104.html
> 
> Wow dude!  I did not expect a whole sob story out of that simple reminder;
> I did not urge anybody to do it right away, yet I just mentioned that the package
> was way out of its release cycle.  I think that the time it took you to write
> all that response was pretty much comparable to the time required to package
> the new coreutils:
> 
> $ ./configure
> ...
> $ time make
> ...
> real    6m33.420s
> user    4m10.671s
> sys     1m53.034s
> 
> (and it builds just out of the box, FYI)
> 

but it is missing the patch used to adapt it to Cygwin.
The patch modifies 27 files and unfortunately does not applies
clean to latest upstream source.


The are at lest 3 points that need rewriting
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple