DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=LC9BQKFKeNsqzXHI5/nQhGZUAtFB3Lz+eB91KrtpvEwxPmc2wUN6N
	xDDaPdDTCorhJPVS/xKJ7TLylpfDEV6jj+Ka9UXqr/HrnAzrR0PfVzjkRiokU36o
	qQDUo5YoU2GKBch1ri8ypj0hsVouofswpkuFh27Rpx5bE8IIYFsMmY=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 10:44:27 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: headache on build repeatibility: octave vs BLODA ?
Message-ID: <20200129094427.GI3549@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <2904b4fa-6349-bd3e-c4ff-4b32a0bb3838@gmail.com> <87y2tvs278.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <9b370970-fcfe-cca9-321f-973de777642a@gmail.com> <878sluhcc1.fsf@Otto.invalid> <08ac898e-e7f9-c8e9-91ba-d4ee33f2e27c@gmail.com> <0fb5712c-7d57-d5cb-56b7-3a0d2f44d8a2@gmail.com> <20200127203346.1c8e3657d7283e3aa2c617d8@nifty.ne.jp> <85ddac25-0b4a-5e01-7885-0d2855c37a45@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5UGlQXeG3ziZS81+"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <85ddac25-0b4a-5e01-7885-0d2855c37a45@gmail.com>

--5UGlQXeG3ziZS81+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Jan 28 07:41, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> Am 27.01.2020 um 12:33 schrieb Takashi Yano:
> > On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:45:08 +0100
> > Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > > Can you and Takashi provide me your cygcheck.out so that I can look on
> > > possible difference that could influence the build behaviour.
> >=20
> > Attached.
> >=20
>=20
> Thanks Takashi,
>=20
> I duplicated your installation from scratch on my W10 Home
> and it fails again in the same place.
>=20
> So I am now almost sure that the recent MS updates changed/broke
> something in W10 Home. :-((
>=20
> Assuming it does not break German systems and left immune
> Japanese ones  :-?
>=20
> I will try to install the same in a W10 Pro and if that
> does not segfault I can try the lengthy process to compare
> the object/dll/exec files to see where is the difference.
>=20
>=20
> Corinna,
> there are specific code differences in Cygwin DLL between
> W10 Home and Pro ?

Sorry for the late reply, Marco.

No, there are no code differences in Cygwin based on "Home" vs.  "Pro"
vs. "Enterprise" editions.  Differences are mainly based on Windows
versions, as in W10 1803, W10 1809, etc.  Other differences in code
execution are based on workstation vs. server (evaluating scheduling
timing from registry) or stand-alone vs. domain machine (passwd/group
stuff).  Of course, even small differences in your setup (Windows
permissions, etc.) may lead to very different code execution.

If you suspect a Cygwin bug, it would be helpful to see an strace
of the crash.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer

--5UGlQXeG3ziZS81+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=/6B7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5UGlQXeG3ziZS81+--