DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to
	:references:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=yUtrgQPZE9JxgMsqQf3du296zqWBvd313VuPZ5d6dEc
	ET/0BeBlJgmE+Ac7TsyzfBB9ZxbNp11porMXV4Ysk3HkgFA4G14miCC8lV2drqL8
	gRNvW9vnxjZVCr3RETUQPw0OExNfG8wJj9JCPgzMjXtrz4CboAS+mGr5b+WEKzqM
	=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <14dafe2e9b4f35791a420b1db923f8052a54e1e2.camel@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.1.1d/1.0.2t Availability
From: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 10:47:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <ae1bccc9f101499bba550d8b36c137f9@ngc.com>
References: <ae1bccc9f101499bba550d8b36c137f9@ngc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.4 (3.32.4-1.fc30)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 14:25 +0000, D'Ambra, Nikki M wrote:
> Now that the latest versions of openssl, versions 1.1.1d and 1.0.2t, are available 
> to the public, are there plans, or an ETA, to make these openssl packages available 
> to the cygwin community?

Of course there are, but it hasn't even hit Fedora rawhide yet.  Please
note that the security issues fixed by these versions are ranked low
even by OpenSSL standards.

--
Yaakov


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple