DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:subject
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=
	default; b=CqsM2N6iDoC0NmIh/CMMTt8Ssy7YPuQ319SVYBrscyDYT9Me+vgyi
	058l6UzGRS7GtpmERvg9XD2yPNGXGc7pxo65D+QqsyA6kR8n5mPtChd95Hgu8fk6
	WxWxK9xEcmbVj1gROW44ywCLrs6jYEEvvSFhZvXYnaT5MRkl/KXVzc=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 11:45:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: falk.tannhauser@free.fr
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <732305300.268416262.1565603129541.JavaMail.root@zimbra54-e10.priv.proxad.net>
In-Reply-To: <1436640898.268382790.1565602671940.JavaMail.root@zimbra54-e10.priv.proxad.net>
Subject: Re: Inefficient use of 64-bit addresses in Clang
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

References: <578eb489-9391-9009-82ad-676eeb4c1c92@agner.org>
In-Reply-To: <578eb489-9391-9009-82ad-676eeb4c1c92@agner.org>

Could the different behaviour between Cygwin and Linux simply be due to different Clang versions?
The current version under Cygwin is 5.0.1, while the latest version available under Linux
appears to be 8.0.1 .

Falk

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple