DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=L9H8bk92WJpXyTdl
	mc5YWgg3kurSoSql2r59nmuwgFuBWc5Z4Z127XSGFasybkGyWzVk3bng4QFQOZgl
	p5WJ+o7zDh5G/3Tt7vW5e7V+JBv8TAU4qGicojxatld5fWlHit7Lv7IBD7CKO3Ki
	QSvbiT83qjDayinkkfUDjz1slLk=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Reply-To: Brian.Inglis@SystematicSw.ab.ca
Subject: Re: NEW DEFECT: Basic cygwin Update Fails to Complete
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <CAAgdLC17StJfXG-gb2cxJGBbGkuFiJ0=4buzV3C6ZG=dazJvzw@mail.gmail.com> <6e331c0a-5a5a-1126-1a47-9b662805b939@t-online.de> <dfc1404f-11fb-9fa9-3d64-5389d6fc78f0@SystematicSw.ab.ca> <73752d84-abfe-1786-b9ad-d06e313cd133@t-online.de>
From: Brian Inglis <Brian.Inglis@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <7d55c49f-49b6-9572-5489-d8c76eed7f4d@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 15:27:26 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <73752d84-abfe-1786-b9ad-d06e313cd133@t-online.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 2018-07-25 13:13, Hans-Bernhard Bröker wrote:
> Am 25.07.2018 um 20:50 schrieb Brian Inglis:
>> If you use a Cygwin shell you can see /usr/{bin,lib}/, etc.; if you use a
>> Windows shell you can not.
> That's got nothing to do with the shell. It only depends on whether the 
> program that does the "seeing" is a cygwin-based one or not. From a plain 
> CMD.exe:

That was just an example to illustrate why the OP's view may differ from yours
without being incorrect, just not totally accurate as described without
assumptions defined.
As long as an OP can describe the gist of an issue, please give yourself and OPs
a break about terminology they may have little interest in, other than to get a
job done, whether for professional or personal reasons.

The previous (elided) sentence showed awareness that the implementation is as
"mount points under Cygwin processes."

[It's funny for me to see such ardently binary attitudes towards various layers
of digital models of implementations, which are based on the probabilities of
manufacturing, electron mobility, weak magnetic signal detection, and software
which doesn't suck! Should be a Cygwin/FOSS motto. ;^> ]

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple