DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:subject:to:references
	:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=jw7dRhDhR8orrcRlabr84wSGSBI7S
	/oiMRCaaORgRXvCYKp6xYCGwrNCDHd1aV5RHZGIhjuh6dhJOBFwPddtrQaPpJNDU
	CcdzEzt+GVz4CME9XcGQpIerN/jqg7YWnP8qMhviywGRENam61Xncam42+fG0fSg
	B6rcx7mc/ROkF4=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <5b17325b.1c69fb81.5acf1.d5a7@mx.google.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 18:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Steven Penny <svnpenn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: My delayed complaint about spam on this list
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <dc60851c-b32c-cf6f-6ae0-0bbadf430818@farance.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8; format=flowed
User-Agent: Tryst/2.5.0 (github.com/svnpenn/tryst)

On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 20:18:59, Frank Farance wrote:
> No, I'm not suggesting that one must be subscribed, I'm pointing out that if
> one wants to have a back and forth discussion (in a practical sense), some
> kinda registration/subscription system is necessary.

No, its not? did not you read my post? i have a tool that allow replies without
being subscribed:

http://github.com/svnpenn/tryst

> Someone suggested a moderator (or multiple moderators) that would approve
> messages from outsiders.

ok cool, but whos going to do it? are you volunteering? if so you should email
the proper group as indicated here:

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2018-06/msg00035.html

> That sounds like the easiest approach because it anyone can write to the list
> and there would be just a short delay for those people who aren't subscribers,
> but the main benefit would be the lack of spam.

No. I am not interested in a "short delay". As I am sure others are not either.
Why should we be penalized because we dont want our inboxes flooded?

> I'm not tied to any technology, and I'm happy to have heard some more
> discussion, which better informed me about some of the Use Cases I was unaware
> of.

ive seen plenty of discussion already - it seems several are against or strongly
against:

- http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2018-06/msg00043.html
- http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2018-06/msg00019.html
- http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2018-06/msg00017.html

> So here's my question (and it assumes that there would be volunteer(s) to
> moderate):

so i guess that means you arent volunteering?

> Question: "Would a moderation system work where subscribers could send
> messages directly, but non-subscribers would need a moderator to approve the
> message?"

No.

> If that is acceptable,

Its not.

> then the next step would be to find a couple volunteers.
> Your thoughts?

again, since you are championing this, it is odd that you yourself are not
volunteering.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple