X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:subject:reply-to:to:references:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=e+0gIspLl1raWRPv
	Lme6snRMTtZijx7Xn42rHhcoQvx6SMsprFKI5u3i9SumX6E1WVFwe3+H9fbUfVde
	/zY05Yr/17dLdJfy+R2ZTSzIgEAbE04OVPlwn0u8xvvjG2yrrIsl0fN57HfDO9sI
	SJMe2pJgAlLCm/WCJ27eZyBnHMw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:subject:reply-to:to:references:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=3D2q3Tv6CUfYgp7zpoXHrT
	fRe6U=; b=yyPeVFs7nfyWFAcTrkbTdv0thB78ClHQ1EN9nSIpG9EffND6PqVPhp
	NLEG92N5ErGG7VcrEiw/z69K1W07bp6H9oirzBaJzCaCOUv0T2ks7qRACjbCf8rJ
	+mDVkluxK6xE7+qN/IEELHjMj/lm6h5wnfkchzUu4HINys0PZCY04=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: smtp-out-so.shaw.ca
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=e552ceh/ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:117 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:17 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=--ovKUIQjZTk_BGyGNYA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
From: Brian Inglis <Brian.Inglis@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
Subject: Re: Requesting updated unzip for Zip64 Support
Reply-To: Brian.Inglis@SystematicSw.ab.ca
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <CAK0ZC5WbOAHpy9RFGAg8VWq95rH5VBNA9bA=SPv1jMHRBNT9gQ@mail.gmail.com> <a617bc64-d913-cb98-c5cf-2877d8f6eb4d@SystematicSw.ab.ca> <CAK0ZC5U36i2ZyH_DA1fZ4v3jVAm-n43U7XnzD7CgavOMyqrb5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6967c50a-c621-0450-8779-da35aa0ac703@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 11:28:34 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAK0ZC5U36i2ZyH_DA1fZ4v3jVAm-n43U7XnzD7CgavOMyqrb5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfHyK5Fe21XOS7i15cLMM/QlLG1c0TbQsjoTriodBEGJh21VJdDIEZAGFrKSfDssFFJ8b9TQ4tXxOS5Z/6yQG+GCjiJsvDzY2m3T+hHBfjxc05Xy9obDn 1JwRegCQJo3IdTxqQe/lzURckq4+VcQ93nlCYwzJcGRqdjZUT66hRHkklpxmrTWPJKu8mybD0mD/hw==
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 2017-11-10 08:07, OwN-3m-All wrote:
> Strange, for some reason the current version would fail on some very large
> archives (8GB+), but the version I linked worked fine in these cases too.

That's Large File Support for 4GB+ files and archives, which is also in current
versions. There could be bugs. Could you test on different systems to check?

Above GB sizes I prefer RAR, although zpaq and p7zip can be better, and p...z
utilities that parallel compress using all cores, to get close to 10% of the
original size, with better alternatives getting more than .1GB smaller than RAR.
Most orgs that deal with large archives over the net accept and produce RAR and
some can also accept and produce high compression alternatives.

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

