X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:reply-to
	:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=TWGKrtCdOn3nJ01s
	E6JbkhprLUz755/sFq8fdWU9Y5B3NgAWAqz6hagwex2os1Ukqlh3XY8Fiu0vbjmn
	2tSyDkMOJav5iowKvtnCJi/OYyPMKcdyV7115i78AwRdhTgJtxuEWvmFZc77hK0x
	s0LzTs240eePHHtf3tOzHNllH3E=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:reply-to
	:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=fIZmtsu0MGkPTdn77XYhIt
	2LZq8=; b=ZTKyQGkyLEaTyHB2PfpZsmuWc7A4/rg6XRuw5KQ+YGdsGiKlEzvkTa
	802K+h5K+mM9bubpArFi64C7Y95EAAR1ovqjPqpIaMhww5YEN/ghlbnjmrRsbecc
	25bVv2f85bdpi6wE+NSGRyjRXDZkhy+r8D6yhskIWcnFn0KPDrMaE=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO,KAM_MXURI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=facilities, H*F:D*aol.com, boils, H*r:Third
X-HELO: omr-m011e.mx.aol.com
Reply-To: n8tm@arrl.net
Subject: Re: Cygwin alongside WSL
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <583VJwmlE8176S02.1508762310@web02.cms.usa.net> <1736415271.20171023170214@yandex.ru>
From: "arrl via cygwin" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Reply-To: arrl <n8tm@aol.com>
Message-ID: <11181830-a64e-38e7-4273-4af6a2bb1762@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 10:51:36 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1736415271.20171023170214@yandex.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
x-aol-global-disposition: G
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1afd4d59ee03454ac8
X-AOL-IP: 65.189.93.33



On 10/23/2017 10:02 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, KARL BOTTS!
>
>> Does anybody have any concrete experience using Windows Subsystem for Linux
>> (hence WSL) on the same machine, alongside Cygwin?
> If you have any specific question - ask it.
> Asking a yes-or-no question doesn't add to the knowledge, and essentially
> boils down to "may I ask a question?"
> Yes, you may ask a question.
>
If you've watched gcc test results, you will have noticed that I have
been posting results for both cygwin and WSL since WSL first became
capable (occasionally) of running those tests.  My WSL results are
generally on an older box which is better able to run WSL than the newer
one, however it requires running external memory recovery more
frequently than cygwin does, and lately has been dying frequently anyway
in gfortran testsuite.    I haven't seen a feasible way to install WSL
other than with the Ubuntu.
Gcc attempts (unsuccessfully) to build and test cilkplus on WSL.  On
cygwin, there are major unsupported facilities (e.g. gstabs) which
produce hundreds of failures.  Although those 2 examples might
eventually be removed as being unworthy of support, it may be considered
that neither target is sufficiently popular with developers to see
support on the level of linux.

-- 
Tim Prince


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

