X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=QTg7
	HIFiB5I5Lq0Tl3R3Oedx1NykhHRrvcS/NPPSHBs3wluqrl0/r2XC2tCh8K+REbXi
	T1OVIF1fp+/oNfWSOfoFfex3KGFFVYgi8KMjjsZ8x8NRTIQ5yGwbaQl8vmiP4Elx
	l9dXNEg6jMZKUcaActCRkaVO98BxZ9zwdd1sIN4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=N/a870mgDF
	7LgLvLnz0Rpbns9pE=; b=Clt78cSlOqO93nIFM7RxrJetW+YIfXSmcT6uf60Dsc
	G+YeBb321J7echh0j+fGY0aeGi8qYNwO5jkZIFC/vWqk/BAD5oXKEmoaT8yVUBLk
	SgZtfr7/eArkikO26SgYLGWOF8SmoR0TkXf+wfdfYRrG4TFgpccz6afDGzlDqZJ1
	I=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:cygwin, debate, HAuthentication-Results:cygwin.com, helping
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com A8BF94792
Authentication-Results: ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=yselkowitz@cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com A8BF94792
Subject: Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <7983d97c-3c6d-e3c2-2304-9527ad4c5735@gmail.com> <59e8f0cd.28279d0a.292b.4768@mx.google.com> <e3abcc71-e085-4355-41de-c6ab30cc4c85@gmail.com> <8a790ade-1761-b87b-b389-5f76d147c099@cygwin.com> <217068b0-f4df-1c30-07f7-8d7cbf84a52a@SystematicSw.ab.ca> <f499654d-44d0-6b06-6add-ce77ad16d5f4@gmail.com> <d4235ee2-1767-15d7-8a2f-11e93a0ecdb3@cygwin.com> <a9cce58b-13c4-510e-e93a-188ac407d95c@gmail.com>
From: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz@cygwin.com>
Message-ID: <e8f6249a-277a-bf7e-f8e5-b64d98f2008e@cygwin.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 16:14:36 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a9cce58b-13c4-510e-e93a-188ac407d95c@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="j6BfwUTpTffGaMxq6TNGi7WRPC3qeHlGV"
X-IsSubscribed: yes

--j6BfwUTpTffGaMxq6TNGi7WRPC3qeHlGV
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="dsKRVKTEPegTihP2sbnwlSvbnrLtv56ad";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <e8f6249a-277a-bf7e-f8e5-b64d98f2008e@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-
References: <7983d97c-3c6d-e3c2-2304-9527ad4c5735@gmail.com>
 <59e8f0cd.28279d0a.292b.4768@mx.google.com>
 <e3abcc71-e085-4355-41de-c6ab30cc4c85@gmail.com>
 <8a790ade-1761-b87b-b389-5f76d147c099@cygwin.com>
 <217068b0-f4df-1c30-07f7-8d7cbf84a52a@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
 <f499654d-44d0-6b06-6add-ce77ad16d5f4@gmail.com>
 <d4235ee2-1767-15d7-8a2f-11e93a0ecdb3@cygwin.com>
 <a9cce58b-13c4-510e-e93a-188ac407d95c@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a9cce58b-13c4-510e-e93a-188ac407d95c@gmail.com>


--dsKRVKTEPegTihP2sbnwlSvbnrLtv56ad
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Language: en-CA
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2017-10-19 16:00, cyg Simple wrote:
> On 10/19/2017 4:35 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> On 2017-10-19 15:02, cyg Simple wrote:
>>> On 10/19/2017 3:54 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
>>>> On 2017-10-19 12:59, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>>>>> On 2017-10-19 13:40, cyg Simple wrote:
>>>>>> x86_64-pc-cygwin is just not correct regardless of the lack of past =
issues.
>>>>>
>>>>> As I have said several times, this assertion is incorrect.  You need =
to
>>>>> use the triplet which matches the toolchain with which you are buildi=
ng.
>>>>> For example, Fedora and RHEL all use $arch-redhat-linux as their
>>>>> triplet, and there is nothing wrong with that.
>>>>
>>>> Vendor -unknown- is just a default in various config cases, so specify=
ing -pc-
>>>> for consistency on Cygwin builds is a valid choice by the maintainers.
>>>
>>> FINE!  But config.guess should match the CHOSEN one.
>>
>> Incorrect assumption.
>=20
> You keep saying my assumption is incorrect but that isn't the case.  My
> assumption is based on data supplied by the configure process.

Your assumption is that the default and chosen triplets must be one and
the same.  They are not, they need not be, and we are far from being
alone in this regard.  Once you accept *that*, then the rest of this
will make sense.

Several of us with years of experience in these matters have tried to
help explain this to you.  Repeatedly pointing to the same piece of
"evidence" as supposed proof for your "case", as if it were up for
debate, isn't helping you to understand how things actually work.  This
discussion would be better served by being specific about the package
you are trying to build, how you are trying to build it, and the exact
error message you are seeing.

--=20
Yaakov


--dsKRVKTEPegTihP2sbnwlSvbnrLtv56ad--

--j6BfwUTpTffGaMxq6TNGi7WRPC3qeHlGV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHQEARECADQWIQRFYAu5jKh4qpenARn/IK+aZu4flAUCWekVvBYceXNlbGtvd2l0
ekBjeWd3aW4uY29tAAoJEP8gr5pm7h+UJDkAnjn2xl6pfxOwXJBG23RqYtV8K6/b
AJ920WN2izAuUEJ6W/BzDwsEsUSJ/Q==
=A7FU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--j6BfwUTpTffGaMxq6TNGi7WRPC3qeHlGV--
