X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=s6Rh 78T8di015cQAOyJlLUobTWBZ2dm0HnZN1ritXQciIgjOEB7L8tBnGMQHeb1AZ4Fs NyiWeTnlUZqHiRHFP1xR45jVlg2MuWiBFltn9ngwduqkm925fB0YPgWyrh9imXVf EjYoWw0eaB9+k76T0he0Q5bos6fAGfZQ6jH+oAg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=lLX4Dfa1Kv i4f6Kg/hCjoE5QMCU=; b=Lu+7Ku1RD7lW0I9JUK36qOuJlUNgRSAzzyfxfjdwJj pMHvD1tptFUp7+WyxYi1+V6wvM1fMWVLQ3dwxmyM6dtxqpg0fz2EbILRuWdiQ/ci 00IfclkABwD5JYe29hZZhTgbDldN368UxIDrvX3jwQrnc0yqt6wbTDw1sUurjOBQ s= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:cygwin, EG, bore, i686pccygwin X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com D833661460 Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=yselkowitz@cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com D833661460 Subject: Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown- To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <59e7e340.e9099d0a.ecab9.127a@mx.google.com> From: Yaakov Selkowitz Message-ID: <7546df5d-145e-14c2-c2de-5a344a7e00cc@cygwin.com> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 20:16:35 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <59e7e340.e9099d0a.ecab9.127a@mx.google.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LlOFnWwAegvWfK3aqPbQtUqueuWwIiqri" X-IsSubscribed: yes --LlOFnWwAegvWfK3aqPbQtUqueuWwIiqri Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="uCtVbKooQSl08M5E6LR6Xf2XdX5qlfhj2"; protected-headers="v1" From: Yaakov Selkowitz To: cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <7546df5d-145e-14c2-c2de-5a344a7e00cc@cygwin.com> Subject: Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown- References: <59e7e340.e9099d0a.ecab9.127a@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: <59e7e340.e9099d0a.ecab9.127a@mx.google.com> --uCtVbKooQSl08M5E6LR6Xf2XdX5qlfhj2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-CA Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2017-10-18 18:26, Steven Penny wrote: > On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:45:11, Marco Atzeri wrote: >> For a regex pattern you should include both. >> I do not bore which one is built and distributed on my packages. >> >> E.G. on octave >> >> /usr/lib/octave/site/oct/i686-pc-cygwin >> /usr/lib/octave/site/oct/x86_64-unknown-cygwin >=20 > This is certainly not right. I can understand that we will have some > discrepancies across packages, but having a different vendor in the same > package is unacceptable. According to whom? 'pc' is the default vendor for i*86 for historical reasons, but 'unknown' is the default for most other architectures. There really isn't anything unusual here. --=20 Yaakov --uCtVbKooQSl08M5E6LR6Xf2XdX5qlfhj2-- --LlOFnWwAegvWfK3aqPbQtUqueuWwIiqri Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHQEARECADQWIQRFYAu5jKh4qpenARn/IK+aZu4flAUCWef89BYceXNlbGtvd2l0 ekBjeWd3aW4uY29tAAoJEP8gr5pm7h+UlWgAmgIyblCjR9z9GWIsl+6GdRi1Jih/ AJ9wwvu7qcznkbfFwpZnElB7fHKFmQ== =VRq1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LlOFnWwAegvWfK3aqPbQtUqueuWwIiqri--