DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=VSts3WW0trtsfJiMdAptk4G3cafs2G5wNwKIs9p2N8UFdCPbKCkW8
	rygXcjRJjYo9wK7mE97X4nWvhnNkkBp0i9oO9qxtzNmz42WiXaucehkVm5rzwCGA
	s5SEw6rwhSI1/hI+cMCjoLWuoVabEVJhrmL6uvrrJXYhwF/0yubOBg=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 15:05:34 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.9.0-0.2
Message-ID: <20170901130534.GJ14109@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <announce.20170830151340.GA23446@calimero.vinschen.de> <c80de942-e567-452a-a491-8c4ca843b6d5@towo.net> <20170901122310.GF14109@calimero.vinschen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FFoLq8A0u+X9iRU8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170901122310.GF14109@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)

--FFoLq8A0u+X9iRU8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sep  1 14:23, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Sep  1 11:44, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> > Am 30.08.2017 um 17:13 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > I uploaded a new Cygwin test release 2.9.0-0.2
> > >=20
> > > I'm planning for a release next week.  Please test.
> > >=20
> > > ...
> > Any chance to get the wcwidth update into the next release? I've submit=
ted a
> > reworked patch meanwhile to the newlib mailing list (for both string/wc=
width
> > and ctype/{is,to}w*) but no response there yet. If there is no agreemen=
t yet
> > how to proceed with the ctype functions, could we still update only the
> > wcwidth part already?
>=20
> I forgot to reply, sorry.  I'm still irritated why you don't just
> simply send the patches as a git patch series.  Create the set with
> git format-patch and send it to the newlib list with git send-email.
> No problems with patch size and mailbox limits and especially no
> external ZIP fgile nobody ever reviews.

Apart from that, I'm not really confident to push this patch for 2.9.0
on such short notice.  We should leave some time for testing before
releasing it.

The problem is that I'm unavailable for about 4 weeks after the 2.9.0
release.  Having said that, we can certainly apply the patch, but
only release it with 2.9.1 or 2.10.0, whatever we call the next one.


Thanks,
Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--FFoLq8A0u+X9iRU8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=wdjc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--FFoLq8A0u+X9iRU8--