DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:reply-to:to:message-id
	:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:references; q=dns; s=default; b=o0Au2gZkn8rFxfONRwKfBIsd1dajlwF
	k8oropKWcaHY3pNJCAKK7e4dhR50ewHi3wKYXsw2i8Rg90iC0g7oZz2bmbggMVMg
	Rfrx987ghBzaaBS4gfcRVTY92L4hJdyD5sZWmuhAzMr9ITvvWdWv1UiWyGsiDkkM
	w3ciocbll5QU=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:12:15 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Lloyd Wood via cygwin" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Reply-To: Lloyd Wood <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
Reply-To: Lloyd Wood <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
To: Cygwin List <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Message-ID: <2012502538.34838.1498176735756@mail.yahoo.com>
Subject: relationship between Cygwin and Redhat / Fedora packages?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <2012502538.34838.1498176735756.ref@mail.yahoo.com>

What is the relationship between Cygwin packages and
Red Hat rpms at this point?

If something gets picked up for Cygwin, is it likely
to make its way into e.g. Fedora, or vice versa?

thanks
 
Lloyd Wood
http://savi.sf.net/

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple