X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=w3ERnKoJ5hhYBf/X
	g+QWonxXP9tFPWC10HjyXAyyXBcku3tpRMSI8UEPc0syBZN6fkpP1AX9UWE14e74
	AVFpaIJEike7b2RyHdHcgR/YqTcdVDdBHnqmTdgz6GUg8/rW604h/LXCcyxuS8/8
	UfUA65dVxAUPe/Hq9HZgBNx5VUA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=oYcDdKPSN6BKQ9VY8QrCkK
	VUiHI=; b=HzkFOmHiYXdza9oPrnpQMpilToxn07ky1YoX25bRslwm5KDQw/KsI5
	coCzVKzQGeDOs+eVA5Uv8Na8/Rtuoilo9b/T07xB799uQk12zKLoWWa/yJJ5/oNW
	Bc5qTbvgrGZk9uM+N8QFu/G7WvVnc1WsZ3+rDWladTDQINR5bGiK8=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Protection, clue, eating, Endpoint
X-HELO: mail-wr0-f179.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;        h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date         :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;        bh=AO73ax0XfuRMvHSG/psYyjU36rT4H3p2szisXvrwo/Q=;        b=kqGfJn7TKOv0LObJmeLkNhCGYv0/vgL5/xXIYJpNXbPybLrVRbsovwkkBGz1Cv8Xnw         /CQT0jg3ZR2U/NrGJF4dhy80OpWZzMseiiUICdPiZ1Evvm1SsexgYBera+X+zTupVteh         muXje+48q9gWHtZjHlYs4Zd0HtkYuowYvFu3dLr7yHNJ4Gft9wz8qmlRaS2Rl4EQUPmz         95AevCGL1hOvml0k0aY4ddYFYI5Aa5R17lWIxZe3X9BeV9nxGF7d1lAVzIdqFgdhp0N0         AHGhlDvqdeTD8VJVJXMVsmX9ibvAWAAns3BhCaNqm92/5ZPcF/uud7zmBoT99hi8tBfm         oMCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxnYfx7ji1hvBE4WFAMiaqtTgRQJbZiTBOzSMyfmK5EOLk5ntPX	BMH99ZiB6N+ZnOcDBpM=
X-Received: by 10.80.226.204 with SMTP id q12mr22402450edl.37.1497979789784;        Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: cygserver - Postgres Multiple connection Load Testing - Inifinte Loop
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <200408030333.i733XEXn023894@mx3.redhat.com> <20040803100612.GP31522@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20170321025614.GA2100214@tornado.leadboat.com> <20170324171101.GI29995@calimero.vinschen.de> <20170328052652.GA2351961@tornado.leadboat.com> <20170402023624.GA2561924@tornado.leadboat.com> <20170507032747.GA876495@rfd.leadboat.com> <590E98DD.9000805@cygwin.com> <d3103f3b-4b9f-5014-98bb-57be37168218@gmail.com> <20170620111112.GD8342@calimero.vinschen.de>
From: Marco Atzeri <marco.atzeri@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0df9ad7f-9e9b-57bb-cc82-c0a434224155@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 19:29:23 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170620111112.GD8342@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 20/06/2017 13:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I suggest reverting the cygwin-20170324 cygserver changes for now.  Older
>>>> versions can be configured to have reliable sysv semaphores, but I
>>>> think no
>>>> settings render sysv semaphores reliable in Cygwin 2.8.0.  What do you
>>>> think?
>>>
>>> Just FYI, Corinna is away for a bit (in European time, "a bit" = until
>>> June ;-) ) so don't be surprised if her response is delayed.
>>>
>>
>> as she is back, we can humble rise her attention to the matter.
>
> I can do that, but wouldn't it be nice if somebody would actually
> try to debug Cygserver further, to handle this new testcase correctly
> as well?  6 weeks, and nobody actually tries.  Sigh.
>
>
> Corinna

I agree.

To my discharge:
- I have no clue what to look for, my knowledge of cygwin inside
   is not so good.
- Real life is eating my available time for cygwin.
- The Symantec Endpoint Protection BLODA, that I can not get rid of,
   is making strace impossible and debugging a nightmare.

Sorry
Marco


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

