X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=VpbIEkOOV1Ew9Qq/
	Yk612OZjG064m7jaO2PfX9gKg4ZBNwprPIdnVMYk8jwNXq0EaPQSo9XXD1vZX09E
	FDBBxKUFvCcadprf8PSfYF6pU0gk28klxgvX87EpTCe0g4l8RqPPDecSGZCymbzD
	6l3W5pxWa0wAGCERHAVVWJChEZE=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=X1bwrplTt7KUxH4Y0o7SgY
	jr+Gk=; b=mMkq2b0ag03OmSHT7bA8wNVQf8xWmhyDncUOEn7bjI+ntGkwa8coGe
	BpjfApt1Ma63GsRILdt0UljZDDFlcUa7evjk8VG2P217VKZMjRBb6X94ALu2xoW4
	eK0QIdee0yvCzpJUWxQ+LPC5LmK8rbp5cnkvjm6MuSYf/V1P+eJjc=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*F:D*t-online.de, H*r:sk:mailout
X-HELO: mailout01.t-online.de
Subject: Re: CR-LF handling behavior of SED changed recently - this breaks a lot of MinGW cross build scripts
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <0F7D3B1B3C4B894D824F5B822E3E5A175B2636E4@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> <a53282b6-d00c-aad8-76a6-26b4089a9623@redhat.com> <0F7D3B1B3C4B894D824F5B822E3E5A175B26CE47@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> <59399CC5.60900@tlinx.org> <417f84ac-5d9f-dc50-e912-973e90b8a128@redhat.com> <0F7D3B1B3C4B894D824F5B822E3E5A175B26F278@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> <34b26965-34c2-b5f0-a3f2-b2c3df344b08@gmail.com> <0F7D3B1B3C4B894D824F5B822E3E5A175B270518@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> <5313de97-d9bd-d9c9-cb4a-254a3eadcf4a@redhat.com> <dfe98b04-27cf-af72-5e96-7a65460c1e53@gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Hans-Bernhard_Br=c3=b6ker?= <HBBroeker@t-online.de>
Message-ID: <893c8632-1ddf-720b-7009-7e50c5f1ab0d@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 16:21:48 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <dfe98b04-27cf-af72-5e96-7a65460c1e53@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Am 10.06.2017 um 15:48 schrieb cyg Simple:

> Uhm, 'wt' and 'wb' came from MS itself.  GNU GCC was adapted to allow it
> and just ignores it on systems that don't need it.

Not really.  Only "wt" is a DOS-/Windows-ism, while "wb" is part of the 
standard library, and has been ever since there has been a standard.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

