X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=o31OreD/wBQuQN7/
	gPwSNoOGFpQB5E+/Ex0UVwfyPvAKXtZ7wfe4X5DbY2jw+LMjdMhBPpupXX5QT0hD
	hIIyNGPdPcIiOIRxpIDFsHlZ5qYqghYXh6mJDNltjqiYjo1cKoCZUOOAd9S1C3r5
	6kY/kQElGw3iF8hZbJ1+FvV4UhA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=8QuBqc6YV3OuETURUGTkGH
	5ifnY=; b=yNHhd3z2zse+jOO9p/5vWjfQOFMvwPjOVcEb+AaQJNUfp12MTdIsrT
	uS6fPBk5YrFOOrOZvMhVuMadU+ER1ngY21F/FtuVvQDTj5VdQVXsfLGbI2ViHOnc
	Lw6RkGSddWgzs/d9QrM14flR7POGCzFevrhpIzW5IHl+PERTAA5Ps=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-103.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:1959, her, H*Ad:U*reply-to-list-only-lh, H*UA:i686
X-HELO: pool-173-76-164-160.bstnma.fios.verizon.net
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: cygserver - Postgres Multiple connection Load Testing - Inifinte Loop
References: <200408030333.i733XEXn023894@mx3.redhat.com> <20040803100612.GP31522@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20170321025614.GA2100214@tornado.leadboat.com> <20170324171101.GI29995@calimero.vinschen.de> <20170328052652.GA2351961@tornado.leadboat.com> <20170402023624.GA2561924@tornado.leadboat.com> <20170507032747.GA876495@rfd.leadboat.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh@cygwin.com>
Message-ID: <590E98DD.9000805@cygwin.com>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 23:47:41 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170507032747.GA876495@rfd.leadboat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 05/06/2017 11:27 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 10:36:24PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:26:52AM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 06:11:01PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>> I pushed a patchset now, and uploaded new developer snapshots for
>>>> testing to https://cygwin.com/snapshots/
>>>
>>>> Please give it a try
>>
>>> I call the cygwin-20170324 freezes "limited" because the symptoms differ from
>>> the classic freeze I described upthread.  "strace /bin/true" and "cat
>>> /proc/sysvipc/sem" do not hang, but every PostgreSQL backend process is stuck
>>> waiting on a synchronization primitive.
>>>
>>> I can distill another self-contained test case for the limited freeze seen in
>>> cygwin-20170324, but that make take awhile.  I'm sending this early report so
>>> you're aware of the possible regression in cygwin-20170324.
>>
>> I'm attaching a new test program that demonstrates the regression.  My previous
>> test program created sixteen processes that each picked a random semaphore to
>> lock.  Now, each process picks two semaphores and locks them in order.  This
>> proceeds smoothly on GNU/Linux and on cygwin-20170321.tar.xz "cygserver -r 40".
>> It freezes within one second on cygwin-20170324.tar.xz "cygserver -r 40".
>
> I suggest reverting the cygwin-20170324 cygserver changes for now.  Older
> versions can be configured to have reliable sysv semaphores, but I think no
> settings render sysv semaphores reliable in Cygwin 2.8.0.  What do you think?

Just FYI, Corinna is away for a bit (in European time, "a bit" = until
June ;-) ) so don't be surprised if her response is delayed.


-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

