DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=eyPfm8EPv84aj4db
	xbcvPHRS6c5Qlp8qA6r1kvsorL4PaznI7GFBSwi9vGmzDOdBGf7yLQja0sIxE938
	w3DydSTHK0o2y1rttU4hH8OUciHLnm1ggLyywaMvyoStEL4sD4qKtEHgt+6EcMUr
	m7koqAZ1hklzDqsbwsKo4rb8bH0=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: dash-0.5.9.1-1
References: <1835159156.20170223203808@yandex.ru> <58af3c19.01309d0a.781cc.afce@mx.google.com> <1225366877.20170224005008@yandex.ru> <DM2PR0201MB079999334855BA9BB10EC9C2A7530@DM2PR0201MB0799.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh@cygwin.com>
Message-ID: <58AFA493.7030708@cygwin.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:12:19 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DM2PR0201MB079999334855BA9BB10EC9C2A7530@DM2PR0201MB0799.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 02/23/2017 06:01 PM, Tony Kelman wrote:
>> The big question remains, where this speed boost coming from?
>> Is this a startup time? Or some internal slowness?
>> Because in latter case, given your STC, this is a bash issue and should be
>> reported upstream.
>
> Dunno what you meant by STC, but upstream is well aware:
>
> $ man bash | tail -n 21 | head -n 2
> BUGS
>         It's too big and too slow.

Forgive me but this entire thread has been giving me a serious case of
deja-vu.  We've been down a similar path to this before, the last time
around with "ash" rather than "dash" but the arguments sound very familiar.
Brian Dessent has a nice summary a paragraph into his response below:

https://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2008-03/msg00369.html

Now this was "ash" and not "dash" and the actual transition from "bash" to
"ash" and back again occurred well over 10 years ago, so allot of things
have changed for sure.  But I bring this up because I think the parallels
are there.  Since making a change of this magnitude is going to be an
undertaking, we should be sure we're going to see the intended benefits
before enduring the pain such a change would bring, though hopefully that
pain would be short-lived and/or minor. :-)

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple