Message-Id: <201702231751.v1NHpT4m025724@delorie.com>
X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=WHk
	vPVizSQx8TNWOrstb6cYSfQhhR24quZkKi4TJrMYuUHcXrz03yvpbhWw4gJGaGia
	88AGmK0KoKoNYmLbQoeF538M83hDIg/WANqe4+zikLycf5blN74RLhfUa/QyslG5
	Qn3707fenDFywpTR1PmUh0Z7FHkaE/kORGV4FmAQ=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; s=default; bh=1tH1HGiSb
	z4qecIW1T5Vz+TtWSk=; b=nidq9EHl76E2D8rOw3yLM5Tm9WwsRRV6r5epqqbeJ
	mTuB5vu5thOH21bGXwCSkdiryZ3KhlYLwdF2quXvjtxTSiLh+c+K+xGcacJ8QZhO
	Z62tgirKHu5dDaDjpzHlPrLREgB7Al4/jY8Y9XgyEFSHjkRtmEKF/v53qfNvRMI3
	8I=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,MISSING_MID,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=HReceived-SPF:x-conformance, HReceived-SPF:sk:postmas, HReceived-SPF:mailfrom, HReceived-SPF:authenticity
X-HELO: dmzms99802.na.baesystems.com
Authentication-Results: dmzms99802.na.baesystems.com; spf=None smtp.mailfrom=karl.cooper@baesystems.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@nhnams85001.na.baesystems.com
Received-SPF: None (dmzms99802.na.baesystems.com: no sender  authenticity information available from domain of  karl.cooper@baesystems.com) identity=mailfrom;  client-ip=10.37.193.66;  receiver=dmzms99802.na.baesystems.com;  envelope-from="karl.cooper@baesystems.com";  x-sender="karl.cooper@baesystems.com"; x-conformance=spf_only
Received-SPF: None (dmzms99802.na.baesystems.com: no sender  authenticity information available from domain of  postmaster@nhnams85001.na.baesystems.com) identity=helo;  client-ip=10.37.193.66;  receiver=dmzms99802.na.baesystems.com;  envelope-from="karl.cooper@baesystems.com";  x-sender="postmaster@nhnams85001.na.baesystems.com";  x-conformance=spf_only
From: "Cooper, Karl T (US)" <karl.cooper@baesystems.com>
To: "cygwin@cygwin.com" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: RE: cygcheck outputs CRLF
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:51:13 +0000
In-Reply-To: <0D835E9B9CD07F40A48423F80D3B5A704BBEF152@USA7109MB022.na.xerox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id v1NHpT4m025724

>Looked, but didn't see this addressed in the archives...
>Just realized that cygcheck output contains DOS line endings forcing me to pipe it through d2u in certain applications. Wondering if this is intended or desired behavior. It is installed in /usr/bin, so I would expect to behave Unix-like. Given an opportunity, >I would vote for it to use Unix line endings.

The question was asked about a month ago, and answered here:
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2017-01/msg00223.html

Karl
>--Ken Nellis



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple


