DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=lK+AxWi
	SqMsZVsvVoHrtwRKo8lqxSx9xzWK8MAGLXsKnaQRwlI9HoIOEFbmVPyLLnUbF8FY
	nJTyEI0/AWDohptLutm9RMRhy+7C0lSeT0M+VKAbic9rMaEUSEJL2nJT37h3UOY8
	8pQgRcoddDWFYfaDs+Lg8msKpt64/9t2aNS0=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGZiy71hduc-LZvLvqXWNzYpN7foKrvobVP5q3S=KeagukQAsg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGZiy71hduc-LZvLvqXWNzYpN7foKrvobVP5q3S=KeagukQAsg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ismail Donmez <ismail@i10z.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:10:45 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFo71_4-TzfjbDK_JdOya7c-Nhtv9DfuFtgSaT2AEf=FDShpvw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Latest setup.exe not code-signed?
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hello,

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:58 AM, Kal Sze <swordangel@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It looks like the new setup-x86_64.exe is not code-signed? Is that on
> purpose? IIRC, the previous versions were code-signed. Do we now only
> rely on the .sig signature file to verify it?

It was never code signed and the reasons for this has been discussed
before. You can search the list for the reasons.

Regards,
ismail

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple