X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Eb3Pz6UGeV1AzQLK
	TPi7gIj9c9aFkmpx8n8AnZEYdRcwNL+ZZa1vl84/IKKD3DcxmyqRd0LxdUXjo1C/
	GoNd4MCpZo7kRziP6hmnhRR+2hFZNc9DsM8YqONV6AglCBxKMiJ8sGoKRdOPdhC7
	UDFzAyqLDsvhWpnySN7joyrctZc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=zxyVDedHgb1vVEtzVth9kO
	6l3i4=; b=VwB4ln6EtIbxWYh1iMFYTq2KF7eN4zTGjq7Gyh6VhzCe0BPl6tkUFr
	nVhwnfNL0j1FUC0jO2X2gT2S2SzU+3aPt0WCV799xYU5omr9vQj2fCe5bBvMtOAP
	ZSrEf+vtG0tDntYKcE6T9Lkd69B1L0Ps7lp32VH3X0dvZs32GxnIE=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Repin, Andrey, andrey, repin
X-HELO: forward1p.cmail.yandex.net
Authentication-Results: smtp1m.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru
X-Yandex-Suid-Status: 1 0,1 0
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 13:31:08 +0300
From: Andrey Repin <anrdaemon@yandex.ru>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <892577849.20161007133108@yandex.ru>
To: Linda Walsh <cygwin@tlinx.org>, cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Blocking a base package from installing
In-Reply-To: <57F6E725.9090001@tlinx.org>
References: <CAGHJv4cPr2Pe31nBg+KZ1nbODGtb977NOxOHgXyd89xEY2uh0g@mail.gmail.com>   <878tu1qtes.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <57F6966E.4050303@tlinx.org>  <874m4pqp27.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <57F6E725.9090001@tlinx.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Greetings, Linda Walsh!

> Achim Gratz wrote:
>> Now, that last question of yours: No, the package manager should never
>> allow you to not install a base package.  These are in category "Base"
>> precisely so the rest of the system can rely on the functionality
>> provided.
[snip]
>         But back to the 1st Q.  What other programs will fail to work
> if the base-version of vim isn't installed?

The question is not about vim, the question is about base category in general.
It's vim only now, tomorrow it'll be something else. You have to stop and draw
the line somewhere, if you, as a package maintainer, want a predictable
behavior for all future installations.


-- 
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Friday, October 7, 2016 13:28:54

Sorry for my terrible english...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

