DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=XX3Nk0YAluJsCySX
	qjW03pswib70UJX1o6bwbNe0n4mPkaXPizPle++e+aA1PHGebL5p0dtiHWX4Gzhj
	cX/tCWnAGwPKgBBeqR6d4rpspf9Rdwh5kkoxXmTj95G43Yhd4IwsG1cRuVP8UqPK
	fXtZmvxnPa4qcdPZWgee0EtjN8o=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Latest "setup-x86(_64)?\.exe" version supporting WinXP
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <CAC2zJ1u6Ebssg5M+P=BPsQQU_gTN9i5P1_PfHb_xM2Hxww0J1w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vlado <v.99cygwin@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4f65abac-bf47-fda0-7201-e59f717b70d2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:34:24 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAC2zJ1u6Ebssg5M+P=BPsQQU_gTN9i5P1_PfHb_xM2Hxww0J1w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 4.10.2016 13:02, Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> Would you also, please, confirm the validity of those files?

Hello Sophoklis,

I can confirm, that sha1sum of setup-x86_64-2.874.exe is valid.
Unfortunately, I don't have setup-x86-2.874.exe archived.

Vlado

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple