X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=YgANXX5
	sdBZo4r5dmtOUYEfNGJ+tCbIeegBEfGbIvQ54FHSpCvN+7rQ1lPF2eTP7gRCOoM0
	Jt+wIcTarYcLbKUYk3orSGigAuwI24URTxjqXHD+Ronq3cMCAsjFFjpxFr1NKmwL
	ypwUgo4ZzE7eHrft4Zt2/tLA1lQTt/NqEpBs=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=default; bh=StF6vx0ShCd7X
	uMcjWLbsiLUJHw=; b=Q9JEpRN89vfNfCH50XAEFJZ/tc9+WARGlmOqjohe3ZZ6L
	jV7J9fFBRMRbDCpiKCqLUfh7w1t20iKtXqcA+yEvy3S4kfSzL+qJe1RbFcHTMOO6
	GaPGcV/6/G3n3so305BODAe44JLE/QPt51ATH5nUP86nmm+PIIgQWRbkRHzUME=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=DEL, del
X-HELO: mail-lf0-f54.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from         :date:message-id:subject:to;        bh=UzFFTqvOUyCPFSFfKB0PwTQwud4xg7bStlCg3DoXCJY=;        b=kFzTYQHKrao5R78sUlxq7Ndgv3R06W0xLVLySxllLCG5IghG9+qBIFVN0y7swr/1Ep         59q3GV5ulxT67Ix3rvWvz0LKbv9kkqYbuAawJ8/ADgbOWAgY1ZrTmYsdD/MAIrYTrwxN         2yCRfLaFinA/St7/jvEa5/Wu5oWZNUhLLfNRTYG8X8N1x+OY2Q+oe8WFppjhYL9mXcYA         JHk0DqE2X8OPg/W+2yt5W4pvr442NVDtHTaSF854+psQPAXbMS0pzlPwXUo+N9/1wHNU         KTXYS9yi5t/UqSQB+UsumElp6Jp433ljLEow4CiuaBO1cy8aWFpeqJ2efaKBvcEWN1Aa         pm/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMbWE6dBGJUpQGw6pjeWSKTx+RQTlKzObhJoZncrnLkPUzIzRLxPLl4SIIHQYWHrYUQbkUe66oxZ5F8gw==
X-Received: by 10.25.151.132 with SMTP id z126mr6523530lfd.224.1472855909852; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 15:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMZ6u3uQHxzrmkNjzZz9R-O8isDs-aPx6pBNoWg4CT_jzFnjCA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMZ6u3uQHxzrmkNjzZz9R-O8isDs-aPx6pBNoWg4CT_jzFnjCA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Erik Soderquist <ErikSoderquist@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 18:38:28 -0400
Message-ID: <CACoZoo3Wi3zs6WC3sDX3BvWWkipZFZ5U_UUBxehhRuZuKnxqXA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: updated vim broke arrow/delete keys
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Felipe Vieira wrote:
> no my vimrc. From http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/htmldoc/map.html:
>
> *<Nop>*
> A easier way to get a mapping that doesn't produce anything, is to use "<Nop>".
>
> Anyways this is not the expected behavior. Is there some complexity
> here that I'm not capturing? In theory I'm disabling the <esc> key and
> that's all. Why is it interfering with m arrow keys and the del key?


If I recall correctly, some keys, including the arrows and DEL, are
actually a very fast combination of other keys, and if you could type
fast enough, you could do the same thing by hitting the corresponding
key sequence.  This would also result in effectively disabling all
keys that depend on ESC being the first character of a sequence if you
disable ESC.

Might I ask why you would want to disable ESC in vi?

-- Erik

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple