DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=S1q6BX4utvbcIzt+9LrA1waxiK+yc
	kmEm9CYj1g4RYdL3tsUpAo5yFZhIcZ1Vi1M/YF1Ajqzz9XwWMNkr2NA0VMzvCR4a
	UrdaGW76vcK31H5EDL7Jsc7zedCcbp5tl/e3qj6LzdwJyDB289V1ktE+UMUvEs7e
	glI8QSwyY1v71Q=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Tony Kelman <tony@kelman.net>
To: JonY <10walls@gmail.com>, "cygwin@cygwin.com" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-gcc-5.4.0-2 (x86/x86_64)
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 12:08:01 +0000
Message-ID: <DM2PR0201MB07995B3B84C1DCE4FECAF11FA7150@DM2PR0201MB0799.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <announce.57B25054.3020401@gmail.com> <DM2PR0201MB079940970D55C5E9019AA53DA7130@DM2PR0201MB0799.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>,<57B4EF9D.9030903@users.sourceforge.net> <DM2PR0201MB07990FA162A92324D6BF5B4FA7150@DM2PR0201MB0799.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>,<57B57F47.3030100@gmail.com>,<DM2PR0201MB0799E7D985236F0497437D56A7150@DM2PR0201MB0799.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM2PR0201MB0799E7D985236F0497437D56A7150@DM2PR0201MB0799.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: kelman.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-tmn: [Hgz2NlghFq0OLrRGioWAAH0QKC5R2LMN]
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:10.152.76.55;IPV:NLI;CTRY:;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(98900003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:BL2NAM02HT160;H:DM2PR0201MB0799.namprd02.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;LANG:en;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;BL2NAM02HT160;6:W8fEyFj7HAyM8KQkJh/7O2gKvTqnB58lh5malYqHJaPJpXKen5VMpbQW3I2llDzt16RtdPQX4CzIJop1F/yNnOV2zevhcz4HYhG2urk3HBFQqQKA0MUGLVSazMm2ttyla7ZK1VJ/yvrc5B6/Va9H9yyACopDbE4fAE4xGF49TBF1r1kcfxugdvw0EPOHXF41BOH9UMADbY8PYcnqzjQ+pwrzXU+EO2lvOoxYicNylAJNMG/RcG1eO6Xr1zJMprKsPs+HvdkMcw0shy21vuXYr/ths1Pr0XKfeW34lHPumwtuaxnuoLqjG0WHMbWjS32B;5:Fj6/UqDz0o0KEBdroNGOWjqPeoHwXbqRXXg3/Txslp7VPEbYhEnIldUXz9o1BQF3WYaCxNh+gH3OlGlIiXjGr6Ou7Q41P0FDkvXcMToCIOjfDOypGDPWCTf/2YUm/vQbIvJdFM3NrmkGgKO8Jg+9AQ==;24:Fzru5xa2agnAD0+TuJt4W0BQ5L/G3rwOf0eIPHDagEfzS7M+ldDXwKJ71fr0IUSGfR/t4aXddiJ0I/y1NkTvIFGraCpK1Q1HF4krvBSaTjc=;7:GnTrhpp/U5jxYCfgoM/ZwQ3g9AMmOWN8WRnI2Ch88syK+YzrJWq70G3cq6LTmBXpn4/ZxlAhIdKjY6dUlGtfCigYVfrDVUfduJS0R89pLzMXhsfAOmHQ89PCpPcdnPnKpnzwaJukAv1cqr8kn6j11rILdLuENSXuR41bOlCzrGATp979+kCWEqdrCtdQEb7E5mM/jp8aRswFgX1gzVCjpg2fpTPYaX6k4MwmxYKZemaU4F7GeIfgsjg3oz5evvq/
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 78e94dcc-9e40-400f-76fa-08d3c7604d4a
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(1601124038)(1601125047);SRVR:BL2NAM02HT160;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(432015012)(82015046);SRVR:BL2NAM02HT160;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BL2NAM02HT160;
x-forefront-prvs: 0038DE95A2
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Aug 2016 12:08:01.2672 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL2NAM02HT160
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u7IC8cHt030975

> Sadly I seem to get similar-looking access violations even after rebuilding
> 5.4.0-2 from the -src cygport with the patch for GCC bug 66655 added. So
> maybe some other change is also needed to get this working, hopefully one
> that is included in GCC 6. I'll have to test a cross-compilation from
> opensuse where they already have mingw-w64 GCC 6 packaged and see if things
> are in a better shape there.

I also get a segfault when I cross-compile with GCC 6.1 from opensuse 13.2
(needs wine to run this particular bootstrap build step), so this looks
like it's something else. To be sure, could you test the small ipa-ra.tgz
test case from the top of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66655
with your build? It runs correctly with my build where I've applied the
patch, but the larger Julia+LLVM case doesn't work. So this is something
new, and/or https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68601 wasn't
actually a duplicate of 66655. Will continue investigating.

-Tony


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple