X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=OClG66cuTyPJIJBH
	GF6hsTeIJTncW6EOTqdLEdVqZzQ5O97OAmcEzGuzIq3FOTVq7piuu1ovek2rhj9u
	muX5FJh+VuoBMZHfWyI6V4MO6wOGB5KbQsmPqzWIk7sl/y6GQS66le390SMSuBqV
	PLP1WbMEQsGAT1xEQnkyMohHNZA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=PAMpFYII8UTWoEIMOm7kPK
	/OwKs=; b=NJ7zQjuGK39qMDtaUZBfTjAAAYNKzZgFmLdsRa/wblqrBmEAI63841
	9UIdz3gzPYMbdtQq3hc3/EHilQvUVsNBLI1FH7E9EEO4pwUmOwHcjkQyAPD0uefQ
	T6aGM3KCXndr+uPmpcCvDnpc0cwlNdPVSp/fQW04cMYzu3f9e0ObI=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,EXECUTABLE_URI,KAM_EXEURI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=signing, Hx-languages-length:1846, viruses, young
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] clamav 0.99.1-1
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <announce.201603301732.u2UHW4eN011967@int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <6da62132-1e66-41c9-043d-c552f4faf1c3@redhat.com> <4f86f77b-e2cb-b654-760b-499623dd61a1@cygwin.com> <360d98a0-8e44-e816-ea44-d87a2e2655a4@redhat.com> <91F687B2-C7E2-444D-91C3-2FAD580955A2@etr-usa.com>
From: Mike Bonnet <mikeb@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <d165fc48-cf32-6e55-9bfa-d727899dcc76@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 11:51:05 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <91F687B2-C7E2-444D-91C3-2FAD580955A2@etr-usa.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 5/11/16 9:14 AM, Warren Young wrote:
> On May 11, 2016, at 10:10 AM, Mike Bonnet wrote:
>>
>> On 5/11/16 8:18 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>>> On 2016-05-11 09:35, Mike Bonnet wrote:
>>>
>>>> Any chance we could get a new 64-bit build?
>>>
>>> We'd need to find the real cause of this before it would be of any help.
>>> I'd start with updating to 0.99.2, however we borrow Fedora's -norar
>>> sources but they haven't bumped yet (#1333949).
>>
>> I'll retry with 0.99.2 when it's available.
>
> Or you could rebuild 0.99.1 from the sources and see if that fixes the symptom.  If it does, you have a reason to reject Yaakov’s answer.  If not, Yaakov was right to disbelieve your hypothesis.

The build issue was a red herring, sorry about that. It turns out a 
specific file, xdate.exe, is causing clamscan to segfault. This is an 
old file, from 2012, used for date formatting, but it has just started 
causing problems. I've reproduced the segfault in 0.99.1-1 and 0.98.7-2 
running on Cygwin64 on Windows Server 2012, but didn't go any further 
back than that. I've verified that there are no viruses in the file 
(according to virustotal.com):

https://virustotal.com/en/file/937800ed6b0408b9dba4e4dc507cd0b1962d3adb6285947db520009d19cbe24e/analysis/1463097443/

The file is here (it's listed as "free for any use"):

http://people.redhat.com/mikeb/clamscan-segfault/xdate.exe

The output from running "clamscan --debug xdate.exe" is here:

http://people.redhat.com/mikeb/clamscan-segfault/clamscan-debug-xdate.log

and the stackdump is here:

http://people.redhat.com/mikeb/clamscan-segfault/clamscan.exe.stackdump

Sounds like this should be reported to Clamav upstream. Is anyone 
involved with Clamav already, that could report this to the right 
people, or do I need to start signing up for mailing lists? :)


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

