DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=EbjgqoXijfVN7urD
	LLUq2TUCOa64f8ack2pGagEpWSGcjNJfNZPqivxHM6cbO8dh1OFV7svrGhVBg4YO
	RNFXl2Yn7g1C3m1FL9SO2i4juAqhAWbIN/SeJBWwHvbaeX40brDzhfRuGS6CFpZm
	Ks8MEGdE76BvDCsaXmTkaGUPMfo=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] dosbox 0.74-2
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <announce.201602151713.u1FHDlA5021662@int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <56C229DA.9060700@xs4all.nl>
From: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz@cygwin.com>
Message-ID: <56C2311D.404@cygwin.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:12:13 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56C229DA.9060700@xs4all.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 2016-02-15 13:41, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
> Why would anyone run DosBOX under Cygwin???

64-bit Windows versions do not have any compatibility layer for DOS 
programs.

-- 
Yaakov

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple