DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=gDxRLexsVUWbzHYQ
	E/hjCN2VdmjKvnSENOGqrGykRRV8P3u3bDcFaTXIk/wDXYzQbkRryf3/YTl5Xvq8
	HtrCBDv7/kdslWp6mWQwCjWSrYflokmYdljnkYEq1svWennfPH2NSh/XTVqONB0s
	ujo9gcA+qe17Y7aLIn28JKa9/p0=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: locate and updatedb
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <56BC940F.6070109@zoho.com>
From: cyg Simple <cygsimple@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <56BCD05C.2040409@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 13:18:04 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56BC940F.6070109@zoho.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 2/11/2016 9:00 AM, Byron Boulton wrote:
> Does anyone here have success using `updatedb` and `locate` in cygwin? I
> use `locate` heavily on my Linux machines, but everytime I've tried to
> run `updatedb` on cygwin I've given up and killed the process because it
> is taking too long. Is there something wrong with cygwin's
> implementation of `updatedb` making it not work at all or making it
> slower that on my Linux machines? Or are there others who have success
> using it on cygwin?

Processing every file on the drive will be slow just because it's
Windows.  Initializing the database with updatedb will require a large
amount of time.  There are processes such as AntiVirus intrusion
protection that might make it even slower.

-- 
cyg Simple

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple