X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=yooVp3Vz7oBZ3yGj
	PHPs5d2Oz2q97KF4boFSS0f+bsSC8LpkCWBCfsfYXI9gXfer0Yv2yX3RI0TxKucz
	Tr5xAd7qpJQ2zqS5KqG/xtaQp9P/sR2z6vNXzcWgnOc6w7BBAHHgEUlVfmdl7I12
	jxYH5PUwtbsASHNySTjB2hF6VKc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=gEgsqhoMViB+cOvtgE+yhZ
	tQA8w=; b=n07AdI/0qfPjMB/tSP9NgizoDUDqg4vqt4WeerEGOqwrtXmzhGvFla
	nUdPwpTC9etgN4yJrz0Ymg1pDqY9zWPXPc1Faz0ZEyZZhrwOf0qjSKEUZwz6uam8
	+rGzSxRGIEKFS7tGR4MefpcHvh6q6fWYJr+KMCEPhgVmXPYGeF4o8=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Rainer, blome, Blome, 28012016
X-HELO: mout.gmx.net
Subject: Re: chmod failed: Invalid argument
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <trinity-f5aca8d9-16f5-41e1-a521-60beada36d8e-1453991058087@3capp-gmx-bs39> <20160128144429.GC27369@calimero.vinschen.de> <trinity-1207f321-8a47-46bf-99f9-9c2eb5b08d91-1453997213459@3capp-gmx-bs39> <20160128172256.GB18626@calimero.vinschen.de> <trinity-7ee91fc7-9323-4efa-bbe7-b3420e77c824-1454006627384@3capp-gmx-bs39> <20160128204021.GA7055@calimero.vinschen.de> <56AE6D83.9070201@gmx.de> <20160208142930.GF12975@calimero.vinschen.de>
From: Rainer Blome <rainer.blome@gmx.de>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <56BB1813.9050102@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 11:59:31 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160208142930.GF12975@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:uaoPNVAq0yA=:beBBukwWKq0d8M+OKAJVED mt/3iinK2Q4rxW3FnBFryHOjONotm8rRW0CCG+ZZHaMe3BCJoawPyyBforN49ViORhWzoKIGM fHCSxYiGCayMcC/+SuJfF23pyplFkrRNyEh7m8Skj0384z1f2XMMVTMWRLDGFs4lzJdlHM8Zp vKyK9kT0+agKHTJoBdp4Gs4OHfZMYRAdXAq4S7Zm5AnXE0Rt19k2M1xack18/3CBsgzosZgzb iX0u7rPqFhLoI7/Y2dOKE0s9N2zzKyczjI83FcjhFM59/LLMhDfCjL70lmy1gVjiYY4qC4UJ2 y6XHW/O8EXuAJ3GuHDuDQVdLPABtMN5V43hb8zYVaZzf86ICAExIkXdlTMpLKDCFQG1Mmz/2A gNGYMZqZN1eiHA/amBWBnDgcHk4f2Tu0THtKUTUnrD3YX8pN9nFyKjVuvU7eJzQXAvvlD5Wp6 ASScLSDZIdy1dZ9xE4PFA6HlXNW6mczh/zEYFoem47wrFcKFBi6/0Q7r42lHAjJ41RNgd4tfw JPAcBCVmPv84Kdmef4331Yerz0+0nehgOIEuulcyqTBt5YrXvgwPd2lQOKFabeATN2WBiqGnr cZoxKMS2dZji21vcJbN3bqeiU8s85R9LNS8ncl7x15chgKysy+iO9AA8/cv8AP+zZ7TSeX6/o YMKe3VFpNi07d6yuPxL6A6KRiAJXB0Yv7/VKjOoo65eQTtswErQiNPpJXMYP+KjWHQLt/enao E0b1Pix389PvUWWuWoao2fKYV4OETFWETxvKjt24fNDiq8qIvtAMxP6cnUec27nS/UgdTzgJu ycNpRhj
X-IsSubscribed: yes

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 08.02.2016 15:29, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 31 21:24, Rainer Blome wrote:
>> On 28.01.2016 21:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>>> On a hunch, do you have old /etc/passwd and /etc/group
>>>>> files
>>>> There is no `/etc/group`, but `/etc/passwd` defines the
>>>> group ID of my user as 513
>> On a Cygwin 2.3.1 on a different machine, `/etc/passwd` also has 
>> 513 in the group column of all users. Yet, when I ask for `id`,
>> I get something like this (translated):
>> 
>> uid=197609(username) gid=197121(None) \ 
>> Groups=197121(None),545(Users),...
> 
> These values make sense.

Please enlighten me. To me it looks as if cygwin or at least mkpasswd
formerly used 513 as the gid for "None", and switched to 197121 at
some point.

I currently do not understand this:

Before I changed gid of my user from 513 to 197121 in /etc/passwd, ls
printed 513 as the group of files in the home directory. After the
change, ls prints "None" as the group. But 197121 is the id of None.
At first sight, this looks like the file group ownership has changed
from 513 to 197121, but I do not see why that should have happened.

>> No doubt. So what kind of maintenance do these files need? Should
>> I have known that they do?
> 
> They should match.  For instance, one problem is if your passwd 
> entry contains a gid not available in either the Windows user DB
> or /etc/group.

Does this mean that if /etc/passwd exists, /etc/group must also exist
(and match)? Or that, if /etc/passwd gives a currently-non-canonical
gid such as 513, /etc/group must exist and define that gid?

Regards, Rainer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=kX/M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

