X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=E+ONPZe7JJdyWjw6MCZgYtQLLpS/4ecAkmPssE6dBO+
	UtVKYSFuG6eKj2mz+LEky2+VmpCcswcKY6ka4yPDEZiE9Mx5FhyPajjA6x14aoo7
	gO6LF0lUFy+/EVb/Um51fK/MhVGTEbjsablfHhPC2saDBzrnxId4v3INUhGShIqI
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=wRBQBB6HmrSVVytRa+EiSt9Hpjo=; b=X2NXFs/lnQsA6i4w2
	9PKx5edNcRyTcEb0EMSHWXL3z4IKwE+DxwAF1w9Ew1SQiSkmc5jWYWR6I+NyJZWr
	CCRVpK0J5UHyuIpMr/1wKcH/lWdluAh0n9CSgv6Tj6zT7+xzVBfcS3TA+vOYKNk7
	Wn3NTbdRgrIOhyZPSVghWcq4Fs=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*i:sk:CAFo71_, hacking, H*MI:sk:RVcyoDw, H*i:i57w_eAgeq
X-HELO: mail.lysator.liu.se
Message-ID: <56B9A9D8.1030900@lysator.liu.se>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:56:56 +0100
From: Peter Rosin <peda@lysator.liu.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; Win64; x64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Problem with new acl code and cdrtools
References: <CAFo71_4fDB3WkhXTL7eybNzKh2idVF1UHb7oJjaxFshcS9BFUg@mail.gmail.com> <20160208131835.GC12975@calimero.vinschen.de> <CAFo71_5=KT=kJY-wz0EZWZ_LBriCjX2s6=5PSVhHRSxx-A92qg@mail.gmail.com> <56B8C25F.7050206@lysator.liu.se> <CAFo71_4eQ2VMypAnC=Bx_bvbzGvVCs=jj4r9Ax6GDbgaH1zGOQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA0C06F1-A50D-4DBF-AB58-AADCE3D9F9F4@etr-usa.com> <CAFo71_58PFDgaNU4-bdj4JoCndXAd=+i57w_eAgeq==RVcyoDw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFo71_58PFDgaNU4-bdj4JoCndXAd=+i57w_eAgeq==RVcyoDw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 2016-02-09 08:56, Ismail Donmez wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Warren Young <wyml@etr-usa.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 8, 2016, at 9:59 AM, Ismail Donmez <ismail@i10z.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Peter Rosin <peda@lysator.liu.se> wrote:
>>>> On 2016-02-08 14:31, Ismail Donmez wrote:
>>>>> This is a generic code so I don't want to add a cygwin specific
>>>>> dependency there. Is there a preprocessor definition for cygwin
>>>>> version? I could use that to disable HAVE_SUN_ACL for cygwin 2.5+
>>>>
>>>> Pardon me for butting in, but isn't adding a Cygwin version check
>>>> about as non-generic as it gets?
>>>>
>>>> Wouldn't something like this work:
>>>>
>>>> .../configure ac_cv_func_aclfromtext=no
>>>
>>> Thats a hack :)
>>
>> I don’t know if that smiley means you’re joking or if you’re just trying to soften a negative judgement, but Peter’s proposal is as far from a hack as it gets.
> 
> What Peter suggests is telling autoconf to assume aclfromtext() does
> not exist on the system which is a hack and I already have a hack I
> could use.
> 
>> He is proposing that you write an autoconf test that determines if the platform has this new ACL behavior.  Then in your C code:
>>
>>    #include <config.h>
>>    #if HAVE_FUNC_ACLFROMTEXT
>>    #  include <cygwin/acl.h>
>>    #endif
> 
> I could check for __cygwin__ instead of that which would do the same thing.
> 
> Anyhow the discussion diverged a lot, and for now I'll be using my
> simple hack of disabling HAVE_SUN_ACL manually.

My take on the situation was that you could disable SUN ACLs by telling
configure that cdrtools should not use aclfromtext(), and that the code
that backs this was already in place. I.e. that you could get a working
build recipe w/o any hacking/patching of cdrtools at all.

I might be misunderstanding something though, but if it works and if
it is considered more of an hack than introducing a cygwin version
check inside the cdrtools package, then that's not my headache.

Just trying to help...

Cheers,
Peter

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

