X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=NG
	EIJc/HcNIKeoufFKyL95tSMdYWuNGQxrledAwzZ1sBuVwWaJIwpJPPwAbWV4WJnv
	Qv+mqBSy+zG1IRdrthcOeIRpir7S2fsjb1zK6eWYWyCqABEtNQou+hQxsh/MZEKQ
	20YElSolvpR/5LTNpX92xFZFX8MdK9Oulaan5ukb8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=+/+AlFng
	m6eD7dpeAddcOebT6jc=; b=D5gC3vuom/5+V5BAMUDwuiIsrScQJn2swKlxE9AV
	G1SoFajq43gWfQ79NtImtVLdiBRVIDE/1ETPXp5eDUTvvttXpur9zGfUzeWK0Z5V
	GOvpbDWqAu3IfK+XqChY8wkG3r1bmFt/AHR+veqp5tjAjUtffFBk25UWNK+FZLCy
	HSk=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=stromekonexgode, stromeko@nexgo.de, Hx-languages-length:1524, Stromeko@nexgo.de
X-HELO: mail-io0-f179.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;        bh=epOydfPPI26UDauDwaO/cjMNBg9fEQwoRFZnK8Pe0cs=;        b=IBEyfSNQc3JU9iDgkwzz70cg/4YynG7d7PlgCeKhVy5kCrVm/G83BYEMg7H3mD/iw7         Qls0MZQlJyo28IF6XzpNqZDKbDT39rrdOpsRPF6NFnYH62abS2RT89/vVmm76GzgPvcM         Wefr2G0LsmGTDM7BrKhsUHK4KlpZSgdewGQooVF9TeFdZ5uWooi+AmtsndhZ8/3A/iEG         Amb7EeruTIE10NC0lmYewjUsrfqgowQN5cbus2NJUJjUbSxV7Jwn/v9B7+GkQZWJMrT0         q6IoVTKiFCiKr4zrOMGEKke6A9it/i49CfRnvcJ6CI9dqNf7OfuMwMSKIEzroqFhKO1m         6Y3A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOT+dp25TSwyLXnCmaPPHmhUbOGaSyU4l2dFRoKC5uhazgcN4WStEqeKxt+4GDK8aEIhQUitO8MYxiFcWQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.136.226 with SMTP id s95mr1155706ioi.38.1453947893280; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 18:24:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20160127T125009-669@post.gmane.org>
References: <CALiPeun3bCr9uNNA56Kc-8VbLXFXrTrTWJikdRx0jjRFvAuwkA@mail.gmail.com>	<loom.20160120T085800-407@post.gmane.org>	<loom.20160120T135441-652@post.gmane.org>	<87fuxsjd5x.fsf@Rainer.invalid>	<loom.20160120T215934-785@post.gmane.org>	<87k2n290bh.fsf@Rainer.invalid>	<CALiPeuk2KE9B81qU-YZhTYUXgQEFiE4TTxm_-kFnORMH+wON+Q@mail.gmail.com>	<loom.20160122T080836-250@post.gmane.org>	<CALiPeu=NknUV=Ze=T7wFQSjDu24V2BvmhqwX7rQDGtA=ctg6+w@mail.gmail.com>	<loom.20160127T125009-669@post.gmane.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 10:24:53 +0800
Message-ID: <CALiPeumVkThWP6h4MXeF5F-Nfy49Y0+jUUoijYqXeQVC5yqY5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Base-files-mketc.sh error for non-existing C:\Windows\SysWOW64\drivers\etc
From: David Lee <mailtolky@gmail.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Sorry I missed that - will try the new version today or tomorrow.

On 27 January 2016 at 19:52, Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de> wrote:
> David Lee <mailtolky <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> (1) A bug that the base-files script tries to link to files in
>>     C:\Windows\SysWow64\Drivers\Etc directory (should have been
>>     C:\Windows\System32\Drivers\Etc).
>
> That was a regression in cygpath, which has since been fixed.
>
>> (2) Your concern of whether there are 'other places to look
>>     for those files'.
>>
>> It seems that you want to wait for confirmations/denials for (2) before
>> fixing (1). If there is none then (1) stays forever. I think it is better to
>> separate two issues.
>>
>> First, fix (1) as if (2) doesn't exist (if you have problem
>> with this then consider: the old code is coded as if (2) doesn't
>> exist, why should the patched code be different?)
>>
>> Then, wait for confirmations for (2). You can always patch again if a
>> confirmation emerges - it is never too late. If no answer comes up,
>> at least the bug doesn't stay forever.
>
> There is no need to do anything in base-files for (1) since cygpath has been
> fixed already and with no information to the contrary, no concern about (2).
>
>
> Regards,
> Achim.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple