DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=bzOyFG62Rna8u75m
	7TDGxwcx7qrxiJtR1DO3oOEoJpADw4yac5AnBXgCfVAhYZg0ILy6MLq2UhfokkbN
	4D0Bq+USFjrdiO+NnaVU+FY/i2ZSeRYsiW4dhpw9XoWSCjThdwztRD+RxuE1/652
	K92k/L6bPsQMP0esu/MeSj4zjPw=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.3.0-0.4
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <announce.20151022162227.GC5319@calimero.vinschen.de> <loom.20151023T124504-347@post.gmane.org> <20151023122230.GG5319@calimero.vinschen.de> <20151023122519.GH5319@calimero.vinschen.de>
From: Thomas Wolff <towo@towo.net>
Message-ID: <5677FD30.20502@towo.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:22:56 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20151023122519.GH5319@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 23.10.2015 14:25, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 23 14:22, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Oct 23 11:06, Achim Gratz wrote:
>>> I don't have much time to test it right now (and won't have any time at all
>>> next week), but so far things look good.  The problem with the 0.2 test
>>> version with UID/GID mapping and not recognizing the primary domain in some
>>> cases is gone (might have been a fluke anyway).  Correlating the output from
>>> getfacl and icacls still requires some mental gymnastics, but I didn't find
>>> any obvious errors in the mode bits and ACL so far, which means that things
>>> like rsync (and some file tests) will now return the correct results for the
>>> cases I've looked at.
>> You won't believe how grateful I am having you testing this.  Thank you!
>>
>> Would you mind to read the comment at the start of sec_acl.cc?
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=blob;f=winsup/cygwin/sec_acl.cc;hb=a8ec1e804ee9ba2d6f8304731e593dcf167c9836#l27
>
>> I'd be
>> very interested in learning if the description is meaningful enough to
>> other developers.  I also fear we need to have an improved documentation
>> explaining how this works and what NOT to do, e.g., reorder ACLs :|
Sorry for the late response...
The description is mostly meaningful. Just the coexistence of X and 
X_OBJ entries isn't self-explanatory.
------
Thomas

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple