DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=rmtGrSa2/05EOOiKOlwloiZZ7J66Nh4DH4fne0SBfdZo+gcjaP7EE
	6/2lOwwjk+oqGyQ5doc9I35OaXzJSoiZE7Ay47rH0RMqBPIU7ZY8dlXOsue+PxvS
	E5M33SY1oYmEIflqhdoSuX5aui7tk/SiykZaV8L2+mfEnUvOaLOLCw=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 11:43:41 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: fork issue when lauching cygwin64 process from 32bit native app on Windows 10 TH2
Message-ID: <20151203104341.GL18447@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <565D762E.4090109@gmail.com> <20151201112037.GU2755@calimero.vinschen.de> <565D8D88.4080601@gmail.com> <20151201140105.GW2755@calimero.vinschen.de> <565DDB8E.1090609@gmail.com> <565E14BA.60204@gmail.com> <20151202221521.GH18447@calimero.vinschen.de> <565F7405.8060908@gmail.com> <20151202230011.GI18447@calimero.vinschen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vA66WO2vHvL/CRSR"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151202230011.GI18447@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--vA66WO2vHvL/CRSR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Dec  3 00:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec  2 16:43, Ren=C3=A9 Berber wrote:
> > On 12/2/2015 4:15 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >=20
> > > Along these lines, is anybody here still running a 64 bit Windows 10
> > > which has *NOT* been updated to 1511?  If so, I just need the output
> > > of a call to `cat /proc/self/maps' once for comparison.
> >=20
> > Under 64-bit Cygwin:
> >=20
> > [...]
>=20
> Thanks a lot!
>=20
> Does anybody have the same info for 32 bit W10 updated to 1511?
> I have the exact opposite info available right now :}

Never mind this request, I now have a 32 bit W10 1511 myself.


Thanks,
Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--vA66WO2vHvL/CRSR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=yGFd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vA66WO2vHvL/CRSR--