DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=CPTEt3R9iKvGxt/xGEvoXvlFnadER
	7w812V53ikV/e9OcPNdRhdjD5PVIjV5PNEK29UaVIcZHNqoIevRXTxxm34DGl/+9
	L6MQnTguMwQqFNbWLLW/rOlQDV67lEhbAYnXyHVSFyJXopmYmBWSdWBx+ZIqkgrj
	o98A3hgnZzbyk4=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 07:59:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CAK-n8j5ihsWL=acJE7bUTCHZuCUcKvk-hEPTAtfg0c00tuBi=w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Cygwin64 vs. Cygwin (speed)
From: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

In another thread, I wrote (and Corinna replied):

>> I have tried 64-bit Cygwin in the past.  I do a lot of file I/O and
>> sorting/searching on largish test-based data sets, and 64-bit was
>> noticeably slower than 32-bit Cygwin,
>
> Hmm, I usually have the opposite impression...

I'm using malloc/calloc, is there a different memory allocator I
should be using for Cygwin64?

Thanks - Jim

-- 
Jim Reisert AD1C, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple