DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=
	default; b=Wpgg0QPeZ/tv5b2gqXpoKes1m7qLAbAghfd6aeT3Se8EKuZcPnd/o
	7reSqqOU0L2uQdojEjRtFkNP3H4L+XYZcpv2e6Yn2fpRS0PIiKdDLFr7Jr6XoIiP
	OqXmy0r671DxpDzhxpFNZqkU2Be/AwhsjShx0j6IZVmnS/kcKrTNKQ=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Andrew Schulman <schulman.andrew@epa.gov>
Subject: Re: why no gpg-agent for Cygwin?
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 06:31:58 -0400
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <2esiuat7dre4q0gjjv81ghh8n6q842kqhe@4ax.com>
References: <l67hua1o9aitihq63muuqce0dvcrgrk9hb@4ax.com> <20150904100308.GA14466@dinwoodie.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 03:20:45PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > So, why isn't there a gpg-agent for Cygwin?  Any hope of having one some
> > day?
> 
> I suspect simply because nobody has packaged one, and somebody has to do
> the work to make it available.  I doubt anyone would object to you
> submitting an Intent To Package per https://cygwin.com/setup.html.

If that's the only reason, I could certainly look at packaging it.  I guess I'd
like to hear from Marco first though, the gnupg maintainer, to tell us if there
isn't some other reason.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple