DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=YagW
	YDwhYh990AowMLsSY5aqYA8BUTyy41bSps61J72g7g49v2OYhMIAkb3gOomk+knR
	4RKh10x/URAtbcWslzZv8EL9uVIp2YudWZv5znNNFVZolWKYtkQzGzVMnJuAMjus
	yAtC6DnCMIJB9NwF+NQXYLKG31e8wqGSpxoEZDk=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 11:03:08 +0100
From: Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: why no gpg-agent for Cygwin?
Message-ID: <20150904100308.GA14466@dinwoodie.org>
References: <l67hua1o9aitihq63muuqce0dvcrgrk9hb@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <l67hua1o9aitihq63muuqce0dvcrgrk9hb@4ax.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 03:20:45PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> So, why isn't there a gpg-agent for Cygwin?  Any hope of having one some
> day?

I suspect simply because nobody has packaged one, and somebody has to do
the work to make it available.  I doubt anyone would object to you
submitting an Intent To Package per https://cygwin.com/setup.html.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple