DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=m7cliIjqkdtO03N7oakD2xVi8HX5b7591wv6GAHTpbpIepNbbudKX
	Kl1+IaaS7x8vq0c81XXO9IH+jDUErJBCRlWDSs1lWyI0EHumxTNluM71p93uTdZG
	SfUpop/bhc8lBHWkAQSLrxv6S24VztEdL4S6fAnHBBTZX8wwCr31Kk=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 20:18:46 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: getent services enumeration glitch
Message-ID: <20150818181846.GA31023@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <loom.20150818T113145-139@post.gmane.org> <20150818112416.GN17917@calimero.vinschen.de> <loom.20150818T191346-834@post.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <loom.20150818T191346-834@post.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Aug 18 17:27, Mark Geisert wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > On Aug 18 09:40, Mark Geisert wrote:
> > > $ getent services man
> > > man                   9535/tcp
> > >=20
> > > $ getent services | grep man
> > > man                   16165/tcp
> > >=20
> > Congratulations!  You found a 13 years old bug in Cygwin's getservent
> > implementation, which returned the port number in host byte order
> > instead of in network byte order for all this time.  Makes me wonder
> > how often getservent is used in the wild...
> >=20
> > Since I uploaded 2.2.1-0.2 just before your bug report, I quickly
> > created a new snapshot with the patch on https://cygwin.com/snapshots/
> > Please give it a try.
> >=20
> > Thanks,
> > Corinna
>=20
> The new snapshot solves the issue for me.  I'll see if I can stumble upon=
 a
> more substantial bug next time :)

Haha, yeah, but I think it's substantial enough.  I'm just puzzled that
this bug could live all this time unhampered.


Thanks,
Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=BErE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1--