X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=hrPNwWHEHrDP2h4qLp5pzWQlnK0aJk2pjoUEVg1O3nlX+RnCEyoiR
	V7u1rnu/MuEVCPgPd7dCWyjtI1VE6FeKkB2SA7R4cRv+8Zr0IRjnz6XHfTW66dgZ
	Kuaqn9etvZrXl9f8ZiGJJV9s9Zge2Mev8hPbIhIKnbLGART/HQSS6Q=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=dWESWq8z2qmZikGf5hMN+f0NwgQ=; b=rtL5qXvkVvVCXEvy5zwUyLnFY2F9
	+aJNX3ywlOkSTNqqL6Z6NOWJYa54lnyIu4suogiMn2kOTsEDEhjHcmnVK2F+ozsH
	EvLzRU7tAjjIdG+fjR2BvBird2lbqcgS+Q1GjisJHS0BSAQ21sdWi3x4ptg4CLaG
	mBLB+8B95+HHUqw=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:56:18 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Shares with strange ACL settings
Message-ID: <20150817125618.GC17917@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <20150817090307.GA17167@calimero.vinschen.de> <loom.20150817T110933-467@post.gmane.org> <20150817104504.GA18305@calimero.vinschen.de> <loom.20150817T125001-15@post.gmane.org> <20150817110344.GB18305@calimero.vinschen.de> <loom.20150817T130510-279@post.gmane.org> <20150817113101.GC18305@calimero.vinschen.de> <20150817113949.GD18305@calimero.vinschen.de> <loom.20150817T134217-757@post.gmane.org> <loom.20150817T142110-402@post.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <loom.20150817T142110-402@post.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Aug 17 12:42, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Achim Gratz <Stromeko <at> NexGo.DE> writes:
> > Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin <at> cygwin.com> writes:
> > > Uhm... one last question?  What's the output of `lscpu'?
> >=20
> > Not available on Cygwin and I don't have access to a Linux box with that
> > processor.  I can ask, but it'll take some time.
>=20
> No Linux on bare metal with Bulldozer/Piledriver, only an older K10
> MagnyCours / Opteron 6174:
>=20
> Architecture:          x86_64
> CPU op-mode(s):        32-bit, 64-bit
> Byte Order:            Little Endian
> CPU(s):                24
> On-line CPU(s) list:   0-23
> Thread(s) per core:    1
> Core(s) per socket:    12
> Socket(s):             2
> NUMA node(s):          4
> Vendor ID:             AuthenticAMD
> CPU family:            16
> Model:                 9
> Stepping:              1
> CPU MHz:               2200.091
> BogoMIPS:              4400.10
> Virtualization:        AMD-V
> L1d cache:             64K
> L1i cache:             64K
> L2 cache:              512K
> L3 cache:              5118K
> NUMA node0 CPU(s):     0,2,4,6,8,10
> NUMA node1 CPU(s):     12,14,16,18,20,22
> NUMA node2 CPU(s):     1,3,5,7,9,11
> NUMA node3 CPU(s):     13,15,17,19,21,23
>=20
> I don't have access to that system, so unfortunately I can't run your pro=
gram.

No worries and thank you.  I just don't quite understand the stuff
returned by 8000001e and what I see above.  Do I understand this
correctly that a single CPU has 2 NUMA nodes?  Does that mean a single
HW socket consists of two independent 6 core CPUs?

Well, anyway, I just got remote access to a 2 socket systems with
Opteron 6386SE CPUs. It's installing rhel7 right now so I might get
another clue from there.


Thanks,
Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Oonk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk--