DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=CkhVhdsYXAcZAPVQbO9DlqWS20szX
	fpdOT/5ueQzqk/WhdJ409NrFue9Pf2iHeOu/jHSEoo5sv/XmpHSIajly/i2MRhe3
	LX6YrsYpekLyvghWpTBTxSt0CjF5Isfj2mjJeRlY4TVEiRFbOaH+mFH5QIJyR9rt
	isfn+JKUl+4Hbc=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 10:25:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKNeuBrRbQXfQJE7SGAAuK3s7ff-hcghu9tv39==O_ktJz33_w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Nicholas Clark <nicholas.clark@gmail.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi all,

I remember seeing a bunch of traffic on the subject of rebasing a few
years ago, with people saying that it wouldn't be necessary once we
moved over to 64-bit Cygwin. Did that wind up being true?

I've got some in-house tools that some of our developers want to use
on Cygwin, and I've been thinking about the best way to maintain
remote installations. If I use some kind of scripted
deployment/update, do I actually need to keep everything rebased?

-Nick

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple