X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=dS
	yyAUSwvr50UYGBJpDJOB4vb4vx9qWo77Xo/AMB54YkF134LT8y7u+sAJoEK/Oxtc
	536kxAKgapZzAINGelcILjCIZbi87CrNpFdBmcjjf0MppSF0i6PzqxtrBts2gtga
	wvkB6NT246l58K85s6wmmXffgIX+8sfM2IxntE1N0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=o1njSMFI
	wJP5l6EKQsgikOazpF4=; b=yrHkOdA75MK09ixKKIeIjjhmnBMNc+G4bdxG3855
	j95HuLQ84Z+l3HrFI1JF4TRLh0BYeEmsLc0+1+IoGEf6Yzzd4S03ZnqgWa88Ucr8
	ewSMlS9Nw7mGNi5OtENVBCIuDXWqAXhdPDe61peMI87zPfc76C34nD39mcDRhJuT
	DNU=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: alum-mailsec-scanner-3.mit.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.136.146 with SMTP id s18mr10263677ioi.25.1438396088208; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 19:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55BB5FA7.9020404@yahoo.com>
References: <55BB5FA7.9020404@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 20:28:08 -0600
Message-ID: <CAK-n8j4hpEnTdOOTLg3OkuY27Ter1dRW2KO1hWto_csGHsxvyA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: MinTTY 2.1.3 update breaks interoperability with ConEmu
From: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes

> Please disregard this post. Checking the changelog reveals that this is
> caused by a new feature, and can be overridden with the -d (--nodaemon)
> switch.

Why isn't the old behavior the default (spawn one process), with the
new feature being *enabled* by the -d switch?  Wouldn't "-daemon" also
make more sense than "-nodaemon"?

-- 
Jim Reisert AD1C, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

