DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=XWAWcsOgN42c9f5k
	ZbbQBoLHWKoHoeJ7cE9B04kWvVjBSbbXYm5qQfcEtF6qjr06RrMYWXnYVM/JYYMG
	3IUfUOvkONw6BQe8pslHU8a1O7YuRiiTYRxSpAWc9zLZsix8kcdcKUnFqLHNy3ej
	vQKSld2CiZfX21LNu27lMHnH13U=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <559DDE5E.2060708@cs.umass.edu>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 22:37:18 -0400
From: Eliot Moss <moss@cs.umass.edu>
Reply-To: moss@cs.umass.edu
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Maven Cygwin native Package?
References: <1436397539.7208.32.camel@cygwin.com> <559DB754.1040905@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <559DB754.1040905@googlemail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 7/8/2015 7:50 PM, Tobias Hochgürtel wrote:
> Can you give me more background why is there no native OpenJDK and perhaps also no native Oracle Java?
>
> If I have the idea to create an cygwin package for Maven3, I have first t create an OpenJDK or an
> Oracle Java native package? Is that the trouble?
>
>
>
> Am 09.07.2015 um 01:18 schrieb Yaakov Selkowitz:
>> On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 00:38 +0200, Tobias Hochgürtel wrote:
>>> is there an native maven cygwin package, which works with unix pathes
>>> and provides other unix features like `DISPLAY=":99" mvn clean install`?
>> No, because unfortunately we do not have an OpenJDK.

OpenJDK is a Windows thing.  It is such a large complex system, and probably
so deeply knowledgeable of the OS it is running under, that it would be difficult
to port to cygwin -- and (in my own opinion) maybe not really worth it.  As with Java,
I think you need to use the Windows Maven.  I agree that it is no fun to have
to write things to map cygwin paths to Windows paths to use Windows native tools
like this, but it is sometimes necessary.  cygpath is your friend ...

This is one area where cygwin is not as seamless as one might wish, but it is
not so much cygwin's fault as it is the nature of the particular tools and the
fact that they have sophisticated Windows ports already available ...

Regards -- Eliot Moss

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple