DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=MlrgGgJWQNqHMu8KT2LDdJDNiHWOslAtv
	XNxFWeI2W4WiV+/hcpt+kde5yGGLX/VDrzW9MlWzVFG/5sgCFCE6GWMW70nSrxpe
	03RlPa6MIKzUTpdHMMUwr2pdwSyjJpk2agrljHlTe8Ci7tsBAgIOzOGRBViN195y
	U9GSslkBgQ=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <555E3F58.7020302@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 13:26:00 -0700
From: David Rothenberger <daveroth@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: apr: enable threads?
References: <1432236172.5064.4.camel@cygwin.com>
In-Reply-To: <1432236172.5064.4.camel@cygwin.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> I am looking at upgrading Apache httpd to 2.4, and it is clear that this
> has not even attempted to be built with an APR without threads support.
> While I may be able to get it to compile as-is, I have serious concerns
> that it will not operate as designed, particularly wrt mod_proxy.
> 
> What exactly is blocking the enablement of threads support in APR?

The last time I tried it, the tests for subversion failed when threads
were turned on in APR.

-- 
David Rothenberger  ----  daveroth@acm.org

"The geeks shall inherit the earth."
                -- Karl Lehenbauer

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple