DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to
	:references:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=TZrd9OzCTBrdvAzJR3n7rNPyLWnZo1gEOcuWqUfdHL5
	HWOB/4ldJkaW5fOr87dYmLqprdtWgebSdLvGHKKUwcfAk++WOHptpiJ9H8G4qUjD
	TXJ/eMYUBHtSlHKBlYBm0eKN0NFPyD1KmT+fYGbXtv6LJMWaTec5uXw2Z7fe/h9E
	=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <1429158329.9844.26.camel@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-1
From: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 23:25:29 -0500
In-Reply-To: <B70FA02B-DAA7-47E5-B104-041C4481858F@etr-usa.com>
References: <20150411103504.GD7343@calimero.vinschen.de>	 <B70FA02B-DAA7-47E5-B104-041C4481858F@etr-usa.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 14:22 -0600, Warren Young wrote:
> On Apr 11, 2015, at 4:35 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > The version number is 2.0.0-0.1.  Yes, we're going full Torvalds
> > with the release numbers and bump them to 2.0.
> 
> Will this result in a cygwin2.dll with a different ABI?

No, ABI compatibility will be kept.  That's what we meant by "going full
Torvalds", as in the Linux 3.0 and 4.0 version bumps.

--
Yaakov


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple