DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=HbhT7ZVjqH6jZzHGkCj71uUhqyqPEQbxWr4VWiNJL6UCWzt56MQaI
	1pwXoiO2pB7VeRhAWKiIyGP4mQsiNKzU4TQki/a9m8WGGcCJixKWVICMRrgs+69z
	tzkzRImmz7nfpoPvb94DjK6xqFQDaxPcEFCLUlohUmtJQEPTp3W47U=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:45:27 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-3
Message-ID: <20150414154527.GN7343@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <2bbd046b7e2ea40818416d8a6d3f15b8.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <20150414085757.GC7343@calimero.vinschen.de> <0ff693d9c8109bdddf3d892d005678b7.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <20150414145052.GF7343@calimero.vinschen.de> <b962c3b9b72680589885fce04084640e.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <20150414151255.GM7343@calimero.vinschen.de> <b3fe246a234bd7f6ee6c9b0ea088abe0.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OPsOAWNf+lTlQ18+"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b3fe246a234bd7f6ee6c9b0ea088abe0.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--OPsOAWNf+lTlQ18+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Apr 14 17:26, Houder wrote:
> >        Everyone:(Rc,S,RA)
> >
> > The only reason I can think of is that the parent dir has default
> > permissions which imply the mask value already.  So, what does
> > `icacls . | cat' in this directory print?
>=20
> %% icacls . | cat
> . NULL SID:(DENY)(Rc,S,REA,X,DC)
>   Seven\Test:(F)
>   Seven\None:(RX)
>   Everyone:(RX)
>   NULL SID:(OI)(CI)(IO)(DENY)(Rc,S,REA,X,DC)

As I thought.  There's a mask value already in there which influences
how the default permissions are inherited.  You created this dir with
Cygwin 2.0 already, right?  Remove the masks with

  $ setfacl -d m:,d:m: .

and try again.

>   CREATOR OWNER:(OI)(CI)(IO)(F)
>   CREATOR GROUP:(OI)(CI)(IO)(RX)
>   Everyone:(OI)(CI)(IO)(RX)

This *should* work now.  I fear you have to remove the masks from
all files and dirs created by Cygwin 2.0.  Sorry, but that's what
testing is for ;}


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--OPsOAWNf+lTlQ18+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=EFQ2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--OPsOAWNf+lTlQ18+--