DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=cAO
	xIntP/ycCiM0fSwY7M+Hn77FFiiZhL/IWNpvqFLLtGeIODFsTpzwztj3NvqbJlb2
	LtXb25XgFCBrHx95ek1YTINavDhfbTTU5lIcwj18hLsYfF+OZIBU9Cf0wwaIX7bJ
	2h1vjjJpUctMU7h1QlzJogALyGgkWv37fPpKuN6o=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: fork/exec vs spawn() - possible bug
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:54:59 +0300
Message-id: <107101d076a9$d6155fe0$82401fa0$%fedin@samsung.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

 Hello!

 I decided to try to return to my GNU make patch making use of spawn() on
Cygwin. Since upstream project refused to cooperate, i use my own patched
version of Make. And i came across a problem. When spawn() is used,
sub-process fails to process Ctrl-C. Ctrl-C is simply ignored. If i want to
interrupt the process, i have to use task manager. With unmodified Make
everything works fine.
 Can this be considered a bug ?

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple