DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=qGnvIJttJL+2Bn98m4M/KSrxqCEbKlsmiOccYXvMXn6
	DqbQjLy9X2KVXOZqzxUoPhenSMv14bmaQtLvgfNLC1i8SaGgx9xThuOFKuoeOAuq
	KbBHcwJQLqpTqJxPGTWeLN4OxwXAc4C0eoDOFP+IC8fZN/tJw1Gd+fe7ECjgydYU
	=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <552A8C03.2070306@dinwoodie.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 16:15:15 +0100
From: Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Cygwin version numbers [Was: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-1]
References: <announce.20150411103504.GD7343@calimero.vinschen.de>
In-Reply-To: <announce.20150411103504.GD7343@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 11/04/2015 11:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> The version number is  2.0.0-0.1.  Yes, we're going full Torvalds with
 > the release numbers and bump them to 2.0.  In future, bugfix releases
 > will bump the last number, new feature releases will bump the middle
 > number.
 >
 > Bugfix?  2.0.1, 2.0.2, ...
 > New features?  2.1, 2.2, ...

Does this mean the version number distinction between the GPL and 
propriety versions of the Cygwin DLL are disappearing? IIRC it's 
currently the case that version 1.<even> indicates a closed-source 
license version, and 1.<odd> indicates a GPL-licensed version.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple