DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=cA
	GXDaKitjshnhuBjqhy+SoUpEZUFGz2UQob4OA7j27fMZ5AV0Itf7IpcMfDY/nr1S
	i6MymXcZwWGJWPodqivcFL915iFDAFBp7aSsA67Zte3BJckHH4B+gdTXQ4DsIJVe
	xBBj9dqC9AgmfGMtzaVwz4ylhuuGFxRUTSq/zvK/g=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAXzdLUZvdNw_UyOXMa5ozoGuG7zjPnz=rRLELFBoEF8+miZUA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAXzdLUZvdNw_UyOXMa5ozoGuG7zjPnz=rRLELFBoEF8+miZUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:40:20 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAXzdLUgnjfeA=LkrdUp68zHterj5hj5BtLqh0W=TCAn1zPrpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: setfacl can kill a drive
From: Steven Penny <svnpenn@gmail.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 5:17 AM, Steven Penny wrote:
> I upgraded to the new Cygwin today, why is this command producing different
> permissions? Moreover how do I get it to produce sane results?

I was able to use these command to produce sane results

    $ cd /cygdrive/c

    $ touch bad.txt

    $ setfacl -k .

    $ touch good.txt

    $ ls -l *.txt
    -rw-rwxr--+ 1 John None 0 Apr  8 02:16 bad.txt
    -rw-r--r--  1 John None 0 Apr  8 02:16 good.txt

I feel that the default permissions are wrong here. On linux when you create a
new file with touch, it does not have executable permissions, for good reason.
This would be a security issue.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple